- Joined
- Dec 28, 2004
- Messages
- 22
- Reaction score
- 0
Hey guys, So I'm currently a sophomore at Stanford University, and I'm hoping to take physics this summer for a number of reasons- primarily to leave open my Spring term for some time abroad. However, for the summer, I'm going to be returning home to work for my research lab, so my pick of physics classes is going to be from my local universities. I can choose from either the local private instiutions (equivalent to WashU, Northwestern, or Emory), or my state school (which would be equivalent to some place like Santa Clara U, for example or UMSL/UMKC, or UIC).
Not only is the state school cheaper, but it also works much better for my schedule. That is, the private school makes the lab portion of the class required, and the lab runs during the entire afternoon for 2 days a week. This means that I will only get to spend time in the lab, which is not something I'm particularily happy about, since I love my research. By contrast, the state school has the lab component as an optional element (which I like, since i can come back to stanford and take the 2 labs, which are 1 unit and separate from the lecture classes).
However, I've been hearing some people talk about how taking classes at "lower tier" institutions can potentially hurt your application. At the same time I've also heard that it really doesn't matter at all if you take one set of core classes at a "lower school" so long as you prove yourself at your home institution. Thus far, I've managed A's in my 2 quarters of biology, As and 1 A+ in ochem/chem, and an A in my linear algebra/multivariable calc class. My overall GPA is something like a 4.04 (4.00 AMCAS)- I'm probably going to be Bio major, and I'm also going to do an honors program here in the Humanities.
Other than physics, I haven't taken my chem labs (standalone classes) yet, because I truly think I will loath these. The chemistry labs at Stanford are absolutely HORRIBLE, as they are graded on strict curves for each 15 person lab section, with people being "ranked" according to "lab performance" and a certain number of people "guaranteed" to get C's D's and F's, regardless of their emprical lab report grades/test scores. They are insanely competitive, and I'm dreading them, because there's no intelligence component to the class, and I feel kind of helpless because of that- it's all about how anal you want to be, and whether you want to write 40 page lab reports on a weekly basis (no joke) to outcompete other kids in your section. I'm trying to put these off until senior year when they won't factor into my GPA (is this allright?).
I'm not exactly sure where I want to go to med school yet, since I haven't taken the MCATs yet, but I'd like to keep my options open for the most selective schools as well as lesser competitive ones.
So yeah, I guess there's two questions there, but yeah, anyway input you guys might have would be welcomed.
Not only is the state school cheaper, but it also works much better for my schedule. That is, the private school makes the lab portion of the class required, and the lab runs during the entire afternoon for 2 days a week. This means that I will only get to spend time in the lab, which is not something I'm particularily happy about, since I love my research. By contrast, the state school has the lab component as an optional element (which I like, since i can come back to stanford and take the 2 labs, which are 1 unit and separate from the lecture classes).
However, I've been hearing some people talk about how taking classes at "lower tier" institutions can potentially hurt your application. At the same time I've also heard that it really doesn't matter at all if you take one set of core classes at a "lower school" so long as you prove yourself at your home institution. Thus far, I've managed A's in my 2 quarters of biology, As and 1 A+ in ochem/chem, and an A in my linear algebra/multivariable calc class. My overall GPA is something like a 4.04 (4.00 AMCAS)- I'm probably going to be Bio major, and I'm also going to do an honors program here in the Humanities.
Other than physics, I haven't taken my chem labs (standalone classes) yet, because I truly think I will loath these. The chemistry labs at Stanford are absolutely HORRIBLE, as they are graded on strict curves for each 15 person lab section, with people being "ranked" according to "lab performance" and a certain number of people "guaranteed" to get C's D's and F's, regardless of their emprical lab report grades/test scores. They are insanely competitive, and I'm dreading them, because there's no intelligence component to the class, and I feel kind of helpless because of that- it's all about how anal you want to be, and whether you want to write 40 page lab reports on a weekly basis (no joke) to outcompete other kids in your section. I'm trying to put these off until senior year when they won't factor into my GPA (is this allright?).
I'm not exactly sure where I want to go to med school yet, since I haven't taken the MCATs yet, but I'd like to keep my options open for the most selective schools as well as lesser competitive ones.
So yeah, I guess there's two questions there, but yeah, anyway input you guys might have would be welcomed.