Oh it was written like that in the back of the text. Typically if we add a group it adds on the opposite side if there is stereochem though. Here is an exampleI could be wrong, but from what I can tell, there's no actual cis/trans here. We don't have any double bonds.
oh ok but had there been a ring is my above picture correct? Like still attacking on the back / opposite sideCis/trans usually apply to double bonds. The products all have rotatable single bonds and no stereocenters.
Oh I meant the above picture in the reply to Feralis, not the original. I was just double checking if I had the correct idea of what was happening. But I think it is. Thanks!The reaction are examples of SN2, so the nucleophiles attack from the back and the products have inverted stereochemistry. But I do not see any stereocenters in the reactants and products.
Oh it was written like that in the back of the text. Typically if we add a group it adds on the opposite side if there is stereochem though. Here is an example