Oh it was written like that in the back of the text. Typically if we add a group it adds on the opposite side if there is stereochem though. Here is an example
The reaction are examples of SN2, so the nucleophiles attack from the back and the products have inverted stereochemistry. But I do not see any stereocenters in the reactants and products.
The reaction are examples of SN2, so the nucleophiles attack from the back and the products have inverted stereochemistry. But I do not see any stereocenters in the reactants and products.
Oh I meant the above picture in the reply to Feralis, not the original. I was just double checking if I had the correct idea of what was happening. But I think it is. Thanks!
Oh it was written like that in the back of the text. Typically if we add a group it adds on the opposite side if there is stereochem though. Here is an example
It would attack from the opposite side, but there is no stereochemistry to show here. The reactions are fine, just basic nucleophilic attacks. Only when other substituents are placed on the epoxide, can one appreciate the stereochemistry. The better conformation would have been to place the groups on opposite sides.
This site uses cookies to help personalize content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies and terms of service.