- Joined
- Oct 15, 2005
- Messages
- 655
- Reaction score
- 9
Talk to us, Jet.
Talk to us, Jet.
Jet, did you just play in the main event? or did you try some of the earlier events?
Back to the tables at Harrahs? I miss my NL tables at Harrah's, spending the day, and night, with Bruin and TommyGuns scouting out the absolute donkeys who play that game, and the shear giddyness we'd get when "Big Boy" would come to sit our table. Bruin knows who I'm talking about. Oh well, guess I can only go back on vacation. No casinos here in Arkansas. Closest thing is Memphis which is two hours away. Guess I'll need a good weekend off to make it worth the trip.
You put yourself in an ideal position- all your monies in the middle as a huge favorite. Not much else you can do. And if he's willing to, you definitely want it all in on the flop- if he has a flush draw obviously you want him to pay to play, but even if he has an underset, he'll slow down if the flush card hits, and you won't get max extraction. Either way you did what you could. That's the game, especially in a tournament.
Tiny cracks me up too- against thinking competition he's way way way too aggressive, but the play at that Harrah's is so weak/passive/braindead that his steamroller style works and works well. He's fun to have at a table.
He's not Big Boy though. Big Boy is the sleazebucket disbarred lawyer guy named David (I think it might be David L). We as a collective Tulane group hate that guy, and torment him relentlessly if he's sitting with us. The bastard won a nice pot off of me that I'll never forgive him for (even though I grossly misplayed the hand, Excalibur remembers the carnage), and one of my missions in life is to slowly get it back from him every time I visit New Orleans.
Ahhh Harrah's. I miss that place.
Preflop: Several limpers to you in the bb, I'm gonna guess that means there were ~5 bbs (2-4 limpers, the sb, and you) in the pot before you raised. I woulda raised at least 5xbb and prolly more like 8 or 9x. KK plays very well HU, not so much multiway. By making a small pf raise you're pricing in the limpers to see a flop cheaply and try to make a hand that will bust you. They are getting such good odds that there's almost no reason to fold. Also by raising bigger preflop you create a larger pot and a better one to convince weaker hands to go all in with allowing you to double up instead of winning a small pot.
Flop: I'm not a huge fan of slowplaying on this board. The boards got a flush draw out there and I definatly don't want to risk it getting checked around.
If someone raised big in early position (8-9x) particularly if they weren't playing many hands, what does that play suggest but AA, AKs, KK or maybe a balls to the wall play with some other half way decent hand or perhaps a bluff. You knock out anyone that might be gambling on an okay hand that will call a 3x raise and you tell people you've got nothing or everything. You're right that KK doesn't play well great in a multi-way pot and that is definitely an argument for your side but it is a good hand and to demonstrate that with a huge raise is a move I disagree with. Particularly when you get lucky and hit top trips.
I think you have a point here - it depends on what you put your opponents on. If you believe they have a flush draw then you make them pay. If you believe they have top pair, mid or low trips, or two pair it's reasonable to let them bet into you and suck them dry. This is where I love poker because it requires critical decisions with imperfect information - not dissimilar from medicine.
I guess I'll be the lone dissenter in the crowd, I really didn't like the way you played the hand at all
Preflop: Several limpers to you in the bb, I'm gonna guess that means there were ~5 bbs (2-4 limpers, the sb, and you) in the pot before you raised. I woulda raised at least 5xbb and prolly more like 8 or 9x. KK plays very well HU, not so much multiway. By making a small pf raise you're pricing in the limpers to see a flop cheaply and try to make a hand that will bust you. They are getting such good odds that there's almost no reason to fold. Also by raising bigger preflop you create a larger pot and a better one to convince weaker hands to go all in with allowing you to double up instead of winning a small pot.
Flop: I'm not a huge fan of slowplaying on this board. The boards got a flush draw out there and I definatly don't want to risk it getting checked around. If it does get checked around and the turn is a 3rd club then how do you play it? You'll be hating your hand b/c its too good to fold but not really good enough to be comfortable going all in b/c you may be drawing to 10 outs. A really tough spot to be in. Another reason the flop getting checked around sucks is that if it does, the pot is still very small and now you only have 2 streets instead of 3 to extract money outta the other players. It will be tougher to double up with a smaller pot b/c others may not be willing to risk their stack w/a marginal holding.
As it turns out all this analysis matters not b/c you got to go all in with the best hand. Nothing more you can ask for b/c thats poker. FWIW, he had ~2:1 shot to hit his flush and slightly less than 30% equity to win the pot b/c he had 2 draws at his flush not one. One in five would have been correct if he had only the river to save him.
Well taken. Thanks for your opinion.
Your odds are incorrect though.
He had a 25% chance before the turn card came. If unsuccessful, he had a 15% chance to hit the river.
Pre-turn I had a 75% (and change) chance of winning the hand.
Hitting trips is irrelevent to the preflop discussion b/c you did not know this at the time. In my last post I forgot to mention that I would raise 8-9x the bb w/any hand I'd raise with out of the bb. I'd do it b/c 1) It would disguise my hand and 2) B/c it would allow me to win the blind money more often than not or get it HU. Don't forget that when I make it 8xbb, each player is getting 13:7 or ~2:1 to call, still good enough odds to gamble, just better odds for me to convince them to committ more $$ when behind on the flop.
In the hand above, what type of hand would give you a ton of action if the next card hits them but clam up if you bet out the flop?
Flush is the obvious one, and this would be bad b/c we don't beat a flush.
2 pair is another hand that might give us action. The problem with this is that given the ragedy nature of the board K94, its less likely that one of our opponents limped with a hand that contains a 9 or 4 unless they have exactly 98, T9, J9, or 97. On top of that, if the next card is a J or T you have to get worried about someone hitting a strait w/JQ, QT, or JT.
A PP hitting a set on the turn is another possibility but again, its a 22:1 shot so it's not worth that much. There's only 1 more K in the deck so its very unlikely someones got top pair.
Mid or bottom set is going to call or raise your flop bet anyway so the only time you really gain anything from checking is when your opponent has a hand like 55, which they would have folded on the flop but hit a set on the turn and stacks off to you.
Given the risks and benefits, I stand by my play of betting out the flop.
I would never be described as "slender," so that wasn't me you played with, and you described hair, so it definitely wasn't Excalibur. TommyGuns is a definite candidate. Then again, every class had a group of 8-10 people who liked to play cards, so who knows if it was one of us or another class. Was this pre or post Katrina?
Wasnt' me either, I'm a cash game player mostly and only play tourney's for fun. You def need to give some more info on the hand you described. Were there any ante's or just blinds? How many limpers there were is key here. If there were 5 limpers and lets say $500 antes, then the pots got $24,500 so going all in is great here. You're getting at least 2:1 on your money if called and you have a real chance to double up. If there's no antes and 1 or 2 limpers then I'm less of a fan of pushing b/c the risk:reward ratio is all skewed. I'd rather check there hope to flop big and double up off someone when I've got a huge draw or made hand.
Concerning the tourney, blinds 1500/3000. A few limpers. The dude who had pocket kings limped in....then was the only one to call my all in. I guess with it being the first hand he was playing ultra tight. He ended up winning as I described. I had 28,500 left. I can assure you though I wouldve gone all in post-flop anyway.
Concerning the unknown med student, it was a cash game...no limit table....cant remember if it was a 1-2 or a 2-5 no limit table.