• Livestream AMA: Join SDN as we welcome Dr. John Ligon, a Pediatric Oncologist with the National Cancer Institute on May 11th at 8:00 PM Eastern. Register now!

Atomic1000

10+ Year Member
Oct 25, 2008
49
0
Status (Visible)
  1. Medical Student
Would be great if you guys vote AND include your suggestions (whatever comes to mind) regarding doing questions.

Thanks to JeffLebowski for suggesting to create a poll to answer my question.
 
Last edited:

GMDMD

10+ Year Member
Dec 29, 2007
141
1
Status (Visible)
  1. Medical Student
I liked random, I felt like it kept me on my toes. Sure during questions on the subject I just reviewed might have helped things stick more but I liked how random questions would allow me to review stuff I had studied in previous weeks. When I got stuff wrong or I had questions I would go back and review some material pertaining to that particular question... so I felt like I was seeing enough of other material to keep from forgetting it. Otherwise I wouldn't see cardio material for another 2 weeks until I got through everything again.

Also I didn't want to mess with the question distribution. Doing all random questions allowed me to consistently guage my progress throughout blocks of 50 questions. It was encouraging to see my scores progressively increase right up until the day of the test.
 
About the Ads

JeffLebowski

Just got Nard-dogged
10+ Year Member
Jul 20, 2008
572
4
Paper Street
Status (Visible)
  1. Medical Student
Although...I will say that you should keep an eye on your question distribution, because for some reason even doing "All subjects, unused, random", it depleted some subjects way before others. Which kind of psyched me out a little, but realistically probably didn't make a lick of difference. Still, I feel like UW should fix that glitch and have the distribution of questions per subject per test be proportional to the overall question bank subject distribution.
 

laxman310

TheManWithAPlan
10+ Year Member
Nov 12, 2007
166
1
Status (Visible)
  1. Attending Physician
How about the first 1/2 of questions systematic, the second half random?

Thats what I'm doing.

I did an organ based review, checking off path, pathphys, pharm, and phys on the left and the organ system on the right.

Then I did a subject review for immuno, behav, biochem, anat, embryo, etc.


I made sure to only use 1/2 of the questions.

Then I made the remainder of my tests selecting unused, all disciplines, all systems.

Got about 500 left, averaging around 75% or so, between the mid 60s, and mid 80s.
 
About the Ads
This thread is more than 12 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.