Well, like I said I tried to approach it from a psychology perspective. As a kid, OCD was a cognitive schema that formed so I could deal with the perfectionist family I was raised in. This schema broke down after going to school, learning about science, and thinking like a scientist. I realized how irrational it was to wash my hand obsessively when I had a perfectly healthy immune system to take care of me. So I developed a much more rational schema, and I've been free of OCD ever since.
TexasTriathlete: Thanks for the advice. I'll keep that in mind.
Man, considering how much people joke about OCD around here, I didn't realize there'd be so much stigma against it. 🙁
If you havent submitted it yet, dont. If you have, get it back, re-write and re submit.
Since the majority of most adcoms is made up of doctors they will see right through your psychobabble, esp having some background on psychiatry- you know with them being doctors and stuff.
One of the hallmarks of OCD is that the sufferer realizes that his compulsions cannot realistically eliminate the obsessions underlying them but feels compelled to carry them out nonetheless. If it were as simple as changing your outlook to a "more rational cognitive schema" I'd be leading a much more comfortable life. I'm sure a good number of people go through so-called OCD-like phases, but the actual illness is far more chronic and devastating than being overly clean for a few months or demanding that your CD collection be in alphabetical order.
QFT
In other words, they know what they do is counterproductive and illogical but they cant just stop, like you did.
Personally, I find it incredibly hypocritical that some hardships, say Type I diabetes, are acceptable and even applauded as fodder for all those "overcoming obstacles and how they made me the strong person I am today" essays, while mental illness is still regarded as a bright red flag of potential instability. Anti-discrimination policies or not, until we remove all personal biases from the admissions process, this becomes just another part of the game...
I think it boils down to 2 things: stability and, unfortunately, the stigma associated with mental illness.
First and foremost, a person with a mental illness, esp one that has debilitated them at some point in their life, is much, much more likely to have subsequent episodes where they are impaired. Impaired physicians, whether due to mental illness or substance abuse have all sorts of hurdles to practice and DEA licensure. Medical school and residency are very stressful times and mental illness has a habit of popping up at difficult times. So in a way, it is logical that Adcoms do not look favorably on those with a history of debilitating mental illness.
The second reason is an unfortunate one. Like it or not, many people, even doctors, associated mental illness with weakness rather than rooted in a solid pathology. Treatment for mental illness is not exactly where it needs to be to keep everyone in remission.