- Joined
- May 21, 2011
- Messages
- 2,261
- Reaction score
- 862
I personally think he might of shown superiority and that might of made the other 2 girls feel uncomfortable. But the fact of the matter is that they equally distributed work, and they both practically failed to complete it. The debate ends there. I know in my group if I divided out the work, got crappy work in return, and someone (a college student) made such excuse as having "computer" issues, I would not be happy. If OP has described them accurately, they seem like trolls who are not serious.
And people say OP has no leadership skills. I disagree, he started off with strong leadership skills in this project, but the others failed. It is obvious that those two ladies would have not wanted to carry this project forward (using OP's given description). So he simply took control and did what he had to do. Now I don't know if what he said is 100% true, but if it is, college students should know better than to screw around and not turn in work.
I take it as this, If the divided work had to be turned in to the professor, he would not go after them to get the work in. He would simply give them a zero. In the same case, OP has no obligations to go after them to get their work in. Now that it is a group project, he could use a little bit of convincing to get them to work alongside again. But that's my opinion.
Aren't you a high schooler? I'll put this as nicely as I can, because anyone is welcome to post in pre-allo, but don't pretend to know what college is like. It's the same reason I'm not posting in allo.