I attend a large public university in Fairfax, VA.
(I don't think I'm allowed to tell you the name of the school)
(I don't think I'm allowed to tell you the name of the school)
It's easy, just look around. Are there a lot of classmates who aren't the sharpest crayons in the box?
How do you know this?Just achieve a high GPA as it doesn't really matter what school you attended as long as it's not a CC. Schools will differentiate between CC and 4-year colleges. Unless you attend Harvard, Stanford, MIT or Cal Tech, you won't get the benefit of doubt for a lower GPA.
Another good indicator is how many classmates cheat during exams in addition to copying other people's lab reports, papers, etc. The lesser schools tend to possess a higher concentration of these types.
Just achieve a high GPA as it doesn't really matter what school you attended as long as it's not a CC. Schools will differentiate between CC and 4-year colleges. Unless you attend Harvard, Stanford, MIT or Cal Tech, you won't get the benefit of doubt for a lower GPA.
Another good indicator is how many classmates cheat during exams in addition to copying other people's lab reports, papers, etc. The lesser schools tend to possess a higher concentration of these types.
This just isn't true. I attend a school that isn't even ranked nationally (Eastern Michigan University) which is less than 5 miles from a top 30 school (University of Michigan).
I go to school at Eastern but I work in Ann Arbor at a bar with 40 Michigan students. I work and play in Ann Arbor so a majority of the friends I have go to Michigan. I can say without any hesitation that among the groups of friends that I have there are proportionally a much larger number of students at Michigan who do exactly what you said here than there are at Eastern.
As far as the difficulty of your undergrad, my school and U of M use the exact same science textbooks (for General Bio and Gchem as well as Ochem), so I've never exactly determined what exactly separates a "good" school from a "bad" one.
I will say this...as far as EMU and UM are concerned, there doesn't seem to be a large difference between class/test material...the difference between my two schools rests more in terms of the student body and the teaching staff. UM has better profs, and better students. It's harder to stay ahead of the curve when there are literally 1,000 other people just as determined as you are.
Whoa, buddy. First of all, the cheating thing is absolute nonsense. People cheat everywhere, at EMU and at UMICH. 80% of my friends go to Michigan (I go here) and, as far as I know, most of them (not all) do not mention anything about cheating or even devise any sort of cheating. We work our butts off because cheating on 2 or 3 multiple choice answers (anything more is hard as heck during our exams.. trust me... and for free responses, it's not even possible).. won't change your grade by that much, if at all. Also, most of us know it definitely won't get you anywhere. You actually need to study your BUTT OFF for even a B or a B+ at best, most times. In each exam we have multiple proctors who constantly walk down the aisles monitoring everything we do. Now, can you still cheat here? Yeah, absolutely. It's not worth it, though. I don't know who your friends are but they definitely do not represent the entire campus.
In terms of difficulty, maybe both schools use the same books, but they are MUCH DIFFERENT, difficulty wise. Let me tell you something that upset me when I heard this. Our orgo 1 and orgo 2 exams are 85% fill in the box with a reagent, mechanism, something insane, etc. and 15% multiple choice. The exams are hard as hell and yes, the professors challenge us like none other. A friend of mine goes to Michigan State University (not even EMU) and their orgo exams are 100% multiple choice (from what I heard). It's actually quite unfair but that's fine because I feel more prepared for the DAT and for harder classes to come. Also I have a friend who goes here and has a sister who goes to EMU (both studying the same subjects). Same story.
Try taking a class at UofM and then you'll understand. I took a physics class at EMU as a guest student because it was notoriously insane to get a B+ here at U of M, and I ended up with a 98% at EMU. It was one of the easiest classes I have taken, hands down. There was NO NEED to cheat because the test was easily manageable. I also took Physics 1 at another local university and ended up with a 103% while studying for a total of 10 hours throughout the course. Coming off those two experiences, I realized how difficult our school challenges us and how much "easier" some other schools are. I remember the answers to the questions on my physics exams were extremely obvious or the problems came straight from the homework. At UofM, they try to trick you and you have to be on your toes for every single question to even think about getting an A. In most cases, they'll also throw in a couple impossible questions that only the very brightest will get 🙁 (also, there's no E.C. whatsoever, and teachers will not round up even if you are a few points from the cut-off line).
In terms of applying to dental school, it is very unfair. I work my butt off to maintain a 3.4 science GPA here, whereas I could go to an "easier" college and easily maintain a 3.8-9 with half the work. I talked with the adviser at UofM's dental school and they do take that into account, but not by much. I would rather take the easy way and have a 3.8 gpa because honestly, it is a numbers game (for the most part) when applying to dental school.
Our orgo 1 and orgo 2 exams are 85% fill in the box with a reagent, mechanism, something insane, etc. and 15% multiple choice. The exams are hard as hell and yes, the professors challenge us like none other. A friend of mine goes to Michigan State University (not even EMU) and their orgo exams are 100% multiple choice (from what I heard). It's actually quite unfair but that's fine because I feel more prepared for the DAT and for harder classes to come. Also I have a friend who goes here and has a sister who goes to EMU (both studying the same subjects). Same
This just isn't true. I attend a school that isn't even ranked nationally (Eastern Michigan University) which is less than 5 miles from a top 30 school (University of Michigan).
I go to school at Eastern but I work in Ann Arbor at a bar with 40 Michigan students. I work and play in Ann Arbor so a majority of the friends I have go to Michigan. I can say without any hesitation that among the groups of friends that I have there are proportionally a much larger number of students at Michigan who do exactly what you said here than there are at Eastern.
As far as the difficulty of your undergrad, my school and U of M use the exact same science textbooks (for General Bio and Gchem as well as Ochem), so I've never exactly determined what exactly separates a "good" school from a "bad" one.
I will say this...as far as EMU and UM are concerned, there doesn't seem to be a large difference between class/test material...the difference between my two schools rests more in terms of the student body and the teaching staff. UM has better profs, and better students. It's harder to stay ahead of the curve when there are literally 1,000 other people just as determined as you are.
I took Orgo 1 honors and it was all fill in the blank and orgo 2 was multiple choice test. I have seen them both and you can not assume that multiple choice test are always so much easier and that it is unfair that you had fill in the blanks and some other people had multiple choice because you do not know how chanllenging they can be. My Orgo 2 class would have a series of senthesis, then basically I word bank of reagents (probably 20 reagents) then the answer choices would be A-J and would read something along these lines: A. I and II then X and V then IIV with the roman numerals corresponding with reagents provided in the word bank. Yes it was nice to have reagents there and you could narrow down answer choices but there could be something as little as heat being the difference between 2 answer choices. So even though it was multiple choice it should have been free response because if you didn't know exactly what you were doing you would probably get t wring. I think the not reason they were not free response is because the professor couldn't grade 200+ exams. There was no TA that semester
If you ask me they were actually harder than fill in the blank because you would second guess yourself so much more. And "guessing" on a test with A-J answer choices was not in your favor.
I also had a physics classes with choices A through E. And more than one could be the right answer. You had to bubble in all of them for full credit. (multiple choice)
A,B,C,D,E,AB,AC,AD,AE,BC,BD,BE,CD,CE,DE are all your choices.
I had another class where the final is 100% of your grade. Choose the incorrect answers and what he would do is take all questions from the old exams from the past 10 years and change one word to make them right and wrong. So ultimately if you studied the old exams and you werent 100% perfect on them, it would confuse you.
Class was so curved, 25+ was a D, 38+ was A C, 50+ was a B, and 70+ was an A.
At my undergrad, most of the science class averages on exams are in the 60's. People have to study A LOT to do well. However, there are curves of course and easy classes. I don't think it is too difficult. But, compared to an "easier" college where I took physics...you def see a difference. Physics at my undergrad= meets 6 times a week/annoying labs/impossible exams with class averages below 50%. I took Calc based physics at a different university (not a cc or anything) and we ended up having no exams and the teacher gave everyone in the class an A O_O. (I lucked out). But, there is the difference between difficult and easy universities.
I just want add that I have yet to have a multiple choice question in orgo I or II at EMU. I am not going to say that EMU is comparable to U of M but don't judge the difficulty of a school from taking one class there I am sure there are some easy teachers/classes at U of M. There are going to be smart people at any school you go to. Anyway I know it doesn't matter what I say or do some people will think a 3.0 at U of M is the equivalent of 4.2 at EMU (because we get all kinds of ec).
A friend of mine goes to Michigan State University (not even EMU) and their orgo exams are 100% multiple choice (from what I heard).
In my opinion it's a hard line to draw. Going to a CC is easier, I can tell you from experience. But you are exposed to the same material a university would teach you. Universities just test harder, because they can't have a class of 200 students all get As.
Yes, you work harder at a university, because you HAVE to. But that isn't to say you can't work hard and learn at a CC; your education is what you make of it and you are truly presented the same material. I took biology, chemistry and organic chemistry at a CC and I got a 26, 23 and 27 on my DAT respectively. I also hadn't taken any upper division sciences.
I've since transferred to the most competitive school in my state which is why I feel comfortable with my opinion. I study the same amount I did at my CC and I'm pulling As still; the difference is that here I HAVE to study this much, while at my CC I just chose to do so because I genuinely enjoyed the courses.