- Joined
- Jan 5, 2017
- Messages
- 3,580
- Reaction score
- 2,993
- No I think there was a miscommunication here- I thought the initial assumption was implying that the other stuff isn't as important as stats or that only stats are considered just a misunderstanding 🙂... and they are. What you are implying by saying "should be equally important" is "stats should be ignored." The simple fact is that everything is important, to varying degrees at different schools.
I think UMass has something like a 50% post-II rate of As. That does not mean that half of all candidates blow their interviews. That means that the interview goes into the hopper along with everything else, decisions are made, and 50% receive an A. Candidates rise and fall based on interview performance, but, depending where they were going in, some rise and still don't get an A while others fall and still receive one. Unfortunately, you have no way to know where you are right now relative to all other IIs, so you have no way to know where you are going to stand after your interview.
It's probably safe to assume, based on your stats, that you're not at the top, but it's impossible to know whether you're at the middle or near the bottom. The good news is that it doesn't matter. You definitely have some chance, and you would go on the interview anyway, whether your specific post-II chance at an A is 50%, 100% or 5%, so just STOP WORRYING ABOUT THINGS YOU CAN'T CONTROL, do the best you can, and let the process play out!!!!
- Yes I like that analogy.
-This is literally a thread based on neuroticism. I'm just contributing my neurotic speculation to an already neurotic thread...