How would someone who got a 2.6 for the first 2 years of school and a 4.0 for the next three stand up against someone who got a 3.6 average over a 5 year span
How would someone who got a 2.6 for the first 2 years of school and a 4.0 for the next three stand up against someone who got a 3.6 average over a 5 year span
It would depend on what classes they were taking the first two years vs last two years (joke course load vs rigorous) but my initial thought is that someone who messed up, matured, and then received straight A's in upper level science classes would be preferred over an individual who plateaued.