Originally posted by goooooober
Finally, someone intelligent besides me has posted (not you pitman, I mean ophthobean (not orthobean). As a REAL doctor, she successfully hits it right on the target. If you are a doctor (a REAL one, pitman) and someone asks your profession, it is absolutely rediculous to say "oh, well, I work with people" or "I work at the hospital" or "I am a post graduate student". If you really are not full of yourself, you just state the facts. "I am a doctor" That's it. Now is that too hard? (don't answer pitman, because I know for you tying your shoe laces is a big challenge)Oh, but wait, surprise, surprise!!! pitman has come back with an arguement. One that only makes sense to him and his poor genetically endowed kind. "if you say you are a doctor you are being general, but as a toxicologist courtship can be fun if you state that you are a graduate student for simplicity"...
Hmmm, just as I suspected, you cannot follow the arguments, nor alas see the pun in 'OrthoBean' (tho your "correction" demonstrates part of my point...wow, you
jumped right into that one).
You do astutely agree, as a fellow non-doctor, with my claim that it does not make sense to respond with, "I work" (unless flippancy is called for, but I guess you missed that part). Bravo, you DID understand
something, albeit only partly, yet you failed to recognize the agreement itself....how revealing...is this a pattern, of arguing with yourself?
On the other hand, you have been unable to grasp analogies (do they exist for you?), shown e.g. by your trivial assertion, one misrepresentative of my statements, that it would be inappropriate for a doctor to say, "I am a post graduate student" (indeed, such a statement would itself be a misrepresentation) -- my statement in context: for
a post-graduate student, it is not inappropriate to say, "I am a post graduate student" (read the post again, then reread it). Get it?
So the point still stands, goob: why choose "I am a doctor" over "I am a surgeon", or over any other arbitrary level of specificity (which question applies to almost any field, as for post-graduate students)? Nuances go right over your head? Or the question itself challenges your righteousness? Because there can be no other possible paradigm (of which you have explained none)? Nor is there a place for doctors or doctor hopefuls to be concerned with nuances and analogy, with memory and attention to details, with critical analysis and effective reasoning, with potential psychosocial or evolutionary influences on behavior, with psychology in general, ...with
understanding another being? This is
your chosen image of a doctor??
As to the quoted misquote:
`"if you say you are a doctor you are being general, but as a toxicologist courtship can be fun if you state that you are a graduate student for simplicity"`
To echo my earlier response:...Huh? Who said that one?
To take this as my meaning would be laughable. If you were to
actually quote what I said, you MIGHT be able to understand what I said. Just too demanding a dare? Too..."hebetudinous" in a world of non-contextual, undecipherable and chaotic
mere appearances?
I wonder, goob, do you imagine all those around you as incapable of following/remembering a thread? Are you really that egocentric? No one here has any attention span, any evolved sense of Tit for Tat, any distate for slander, any ability or interest in reading our respective posts for verification? Or do you speak for an audience of one (or possibly two, since you have just shown your disdain for everyone else...although no one here has contradicted OphthoBean)?
Is it really THAT difficult or ego-hurting for you, as a fellow doctor (scientist) wannabe, not to misrepresent?
"...some people actually feed on this sort of humiliation. Others are blind to it."
-Pitman