- Joined
- Nov 8, 2014
- Messages
- 45
- Reaction score
- 11
So ending the semester out of my 5 classes (calculus, chemistry 2, Gen Micro, Latin, Argumentation) I am finishing with all A's and a B- or C+ in gen micro. I have a high gpa, around a 3.68, so its not going to be super detrimental but how will this look to medical schools? The final was 100 questions counted twice and extremely in-depth (ranging from bacterial genetics to immunology to introductory virology). I didn't perform as needed as I had my chem, calculus and micro finals one day after the other, so it is putting me at a 79.9 and im not sure if he is the kind to round up (he took 5 points off everyone's exam in lab for using basic instead of alkaline on a question).
I also feel as if had I taken genetics ( which is a pre req for all upper level bio courses except micro) I would have know about a lot of things he covered in the first test instead of having to learn them from scratch. Another problem I had with the professor is that he would teach material that in his words "You need to know this for the exam" then he would spend 20-25 minutes teaching it in depth, so I would spend time studying it, then nothing about that would be on the exam...So basically I wasted time I could have used studying the actual material to study stuff that wasn't on the exam. he did this multiple times, and other students have complained about this also.
If I don't make a B- im not retaking it, I don't want to deal with him, his finicky grading, and vague lectures again. im always an A/A- student in science, and my grades reflect that. So I guess what im getting at is would I be able to explain and rationalize this during an interview? it is clearly an anomaly on my transcript and does not follow a trend in my grades.
Advice would be much appreciated.
I also feel as if had I taken genetics ( which is a pre req for all upper level bio courses except micro) I would have know about a lot of things he covered in the first test instead of having to learn them from scratch. Another problem I had with the professor is that he would teach material that in his words "You need to know this for the exam" then he would spend 20-25 minutes teaching it in depth, so I would spend time studying it, then nothing about that would be on the exam...So basically I wasted time I could have used studying the actual material to study stuff that wasn't on the exam. he did this multiple times, and other students have complained about this also.
If I don't make a B- im not retaking it, I don't want to deal with him, his finicky grading, and vague lectures again. im always an A/A- student in science, and my grades reflect that. So I guess what im getting at is would I be able to explain and rationalize this during an interview? it is clearly an anomaly on my transcript and does not follow a trend in my grades.
Advice would be much appreciated.