Jul 29, 2017
7
0
I'm just genuinely curious how important good letters of recommendations are or if they're just another thing to check off. i took a lot of time trying to form good relationships with my professors, but if schools don't even read them or glance over them, are they that worth it?
 

peridotthecat

2+ Year Member
Feb 10, 2016
853
1,629
Status
Medical Student
My impression is that for the vast majority of applications, they're a way for the adcom to sniff out obvious red flags. Most profs won't write a negative LoR and most won't say anything incredibly useful, but you want to have them to show the adcom that you're a reasonable/responsible/intelligent person in the eyes of another person.

Getting to know your profs can also have other benefits, both in terms of academics and for EC opportunities, plus they can write letters for research opportunities/jobs/fellowships/etc. where they might be read more thoroughly. I got my gap year job through one of my profs.
 

CyrilFiggis

5+ Year Member
Nov 4, 2014
1,843
2,929
Status
Medical Student
When you're being judged against thousands of applicants with similar grades and similar and/or better ECs and personal statements, character witnesses, aka Letters of Rec, are the only other arrow in your quiver. This is no different in the real world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Goro
About the Ads
Jul 6, 2017
239
145
Yeah I agree with periodotthecat. I get the vibe that most applicants won't be BFFs with their professors, so the letters won't be especially spectacular. The idea is to get an above average, not-totally-generic letter from professors whose courses you did well in and participated in. It helps if you went to office hours etc. I'm pretty sure for most applicants schools won't be able to glean THAT much positive stuff from letters, but WILL be able to glean a lot of negative stuff if those things are present.
 

gonnif

Only 342 Days Until Next Presidential Election
Lifetime Donor
10+ Year Member
Jul 26, 2009
20,818
32,255
The Big Bad Apple
Status
Non-Student
Like almost anything else in this process; a bad LOR can hurt alot more than a good one can help.
Much of medical school admissions is a negative process; that is they are looking need to cut at least 80% of the applicants prior to interview at any individual medical school. So having a clear reason, such a negative LOR (as opposed to an appropriate critical evaluation) can get you rejected quickly. However, as has been said previously, few people will write you a blatantly negative review of you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Goro

GrumpyMS

2+ Year Member
Aug 5, 2015
77
74
Status
Medical Student
A LOR lets the adcom get an insight of you, you performance, personality etc. from your writer. Instead of just a bunch of numbers they see someone else, evaluation of you. A good rec would certainty help a bit such as getting an II vs a straight reject if you are borderline, but don't forget a bad letter would certainly kill your chances.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Goro

Goro

Gold Donor
7+ Year Member
Jun 10, 2010
54,478
80,920
Somewhere west of St. Louis
Status
Non-Student
I'm just genuinely curious how important good letters of recommendations are or if they're just another thing to check off. i took a lot of time trying to form good relationships with my professors, but if schools don't even read them or glance over them, are they that worth it?
We read every one of them and they don't necessarily make you, unless they're all glowing.

But a single bad LOR can break you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Welshman

Goro

Gold Donor
7+ Year Member
Jun 10, 2010
54,478
80,920
Somewhere west of St. Louis
Status
Non-Student
Could you explain what would constitute a bad letter?
"Not a team player"
"Not reliable"
one LOR said, in so many words, "was too much of a control freak and didn't trust teammates in group assignments."
Less than stellar scores from committee LORs badly hurt (for example, only getting a recommend, when the best is "enthusiastically recommend", or best 3 of possible 5 score)
"had trouble staying focused"

One writer wrote outright "this person should not be a doctor"

I see maybe one bad LOR a year. They're indeed rare.
 

GrumpyMS

2+ Year Member
Aug 5, 2015
77
74
Status
Medical Student
one LOR said, in so many words, "was too much of a control freak and didn't trust teammates in group assignments."
I don't know how my school missed it but there is someone like that in my class right now.

Plus Goro like my comment?!? My life is complete now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Goro

ariri

2+ Year Member
Aug 4, 2015
127
92
Status
Pre-Medical
I don't know how my school missed it but there is someone like that in my class right now.

Plus Goro like my comment?!? My life is complete now.
:soexcited: double-liked!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Goro

DBC03

2+ Year Member
Dec 28, 2016
2,432
2,975
Florida
www.thegracefuldwelling.com
Status
Medical Student (Accepted)
Could you explain what would constitute a bad letter?
One of my professors told me point blank that if he doesn't like a student, he "accidentally" copies and pastes another letter for a different student and leaves the other student's name in.

He said he wrote me a very strong letter. I don't know if I should be happy or be afraid. Be very very afraid...
 

ariri

2+ Year Member
Aug 4, 2015
127
92
Status
Pre-Medical
Also, I know this was addressed in posts from previous years, but I wanted to confirm that turning in LoRs later than the 2 week mark is STILL not negatively remarked upon? I'm waiting for my PI to send in his letter because he's out sailing until the second week of August :/
 

SuaveCardigans

2+ Year Member
Mar 28, 2017
435
772
Status
Pre-Medical
One of my professors told me point blank that if he doesn't like a student, he "accidentally" copies and pastes another letter for a different student and leaves the other student's name in.

He said he wrote me a very strong letter. I don't know if I should be happy or be afraid. Be very very afraid...
Thats a d*%$ move. If you dont like a student, have the guts to tell them and not agree to write a letter. Dont jeopardize a year and thousands of their dollars, especially because they will most likely never find out what went wrong.
 

Lucca

Will Walk Rope for Sandwich
Staff member
Administrator
5+ Year Member
Oct 22, 2013
8,238
17,958
City of the Future
Status
Medical Student
In the 2011 AAMC adcom survey, letters of rec were given an importance of 3.4 and 3.8 out of 5.0 for making decisions before and after the interview, respectively.

https://www.aamc.org/download/261106/data/

Letters are a little less important than stats pre interview and a little more than stats post interview.
 

DBC03

2+ Year Member
Dec 28, 2016
2,432
2,975
Florida
www.thegracefuldwelling.com
Status
Medical Student (Accepted)
Thats a d*%$ move. If you dont like a student, have the guts to tell them and not agree to write a letter. Dont jeopardize a year and thousands of their dollars, especially because they will most likely never find out what went wrong.
Definitely. He justified it by stating that it's reserved only for students who cheated or basically lied to his face about something, but there might be better ways to deal with that.


Sent from my iPad using SDN mobile
 

Doctor-S

Grand Rounds
Lifetime Donor
2+ Year Member
Jun 9, 2016
2,046
4,418
If the LOR is stellar and provides substantive examples of stellar performance/potential as an aspiring physician, it will benefit the applicant.

If the LOR is generic, vague or lukewarm, it isn't going to benefit the applicant.

If the LOR hints at anything "negative," it may be very detrimental to the applicant (and this is especially true if the other LORs are equally negative, lukewarm or generic).

TL/DR: choose your letter writers carefully.
 
About the Ads