This is actually common language, "APA/CPA accred or meets the following guidelines".
This is actually common language, "APA/CPA accred or meets the following guidelines".
Busybusybusy, I see how you could think that but this is actually what NC's jurisdictional handbook says: The applicant's doctoral program must be accredited by APA or CPA at the time of the applicant's graduation from the program or one which meets all the requirements in 21 NCAC 54 .1803. Link to 21 NCAC 54.1803:http://ncrules.state.nc.us/ncac/tit...chapter 54 - psychology/21 ncac 54 .1803.html. Hope this helps!
Also, aren't you starting an APA-accred program in the fall? If so, you don't need to worry about this because you'll most certainly be eligible for licensure, anywhere 🙂.
This is actually common language, "APA/CPA accred or meets the following guidelines".
Well, I believe most of the people needs certifications and accreditation because this is the way the educational system works and the job market works. In reality, All we nee is the right and accurate information & training, and a brain to perform. Ask Steven Jobs, Bill Gates, Abraham Lincoln, lawyer, U.S. president, he finished barely a year of formal schooling. He self-taught himself trigonometry (for his work as a surveyor) and read Blackstone on his own to become a lawyer, then we have Spielberg and more ... not mentioning many "psychologists" in the ancient Egypt ( they did not had Accreditation at that time LOL ). This APA accreditation started in 1892, years after Wilhelm Wund ! I have been working in High Ed for many years, and I can tell you - Unfortunately our school system is biased and the job market is too. Its all about $$$. There are too many students looking for psychology, when/if it starts declining, then APA will accredit online schools and beyond !Its more than just for internships. It rules you out of many kinds of post-docs and many, many jobs. Coming from an APA accredited program is a prereq for pretty much everything in this field. Bottom line is, too many hoops to jump through because of it. There are no actual benefits to attending a non-accredited program, so why do it?
Well, I believe most of the people needs certifications and accreditation because this is the way the educational system works and the job market works. In reality, All we nee is the right and accurate information & training, and a brain to perform. Ask Steven Jobs, Bill Gates, Abraham Lincoln, lawyer, U.S. president, he finished barely a year of formal schooling. He self-taught himself trigonometry (for his work as a surveyor) and read Blackstone on his own to become a lawyer, then we have Spielberg and more ... not mentioning many "psychologists" in the ancient Egypt ( they did not had Accreditation at that time LOL ). This APA accreditation started in 1892, years after Wilhelm Wund ! I have been working in High Ed for many years, and I can tell you - Unfortunately our school system is biased and the job market is too. Its all about $$$. There are too many students looking for psychology, when/if it starts declining, then APA will accredit online schools and beyond !
Ask Steven Jobs, Bill Gates, Abraham Lincoln, lawyer, U.S. president, he finished barely a year of formal schooling. He self-taught himself trigonometry (for his work as a surveyor) and read Blackstone on his own to become a lawyer, then we have Spielberg and more
When I was about eight, my friend wanted to drop out of school. I asked why, and he said that it was because he heard that the founder of some fast food restaurant dropped out of school, and he got rich. Ergo, my friend said, he too wanted to drop out of school to become rich. I was unsuccessful in helping him to understand why his reasoning was not sound.
It bears repeating that the people involved in that conversation were, again, eight years old.
Well, I believe most of the people needs certifications and accreditation because this is the way the educational system works and the job market works. In reality, All we need is the right and accurate information & training, and a brain to perform.
Would you consider a school that has a new clinical program, follows the APA guidelines & has Accreditation on contingency for the year you start?
Accredited, on Contingency is comparable to fully accredited.Would you consider a school that has a new clinical program, follows the APA guidelines & has Accreditation on contingency for the year you start?
For neuropsych postdocs, adhering to Houston conference guidelines is more important (presently) than being APA-accredited. Being an APPCN member program is also a plus.
Let me get some aloe cause I can feel that burn.By the real board, anyway.
You have completely missed my point. Some of the worst programs around are APA accredited. APA accreditation is not about quality, but the appearance of prestige. Take Alliant in SF. APA accredited, horrible match rates, horrible EPPP pass rates, but they have a few big names on their faculty who rarely teach to make them look top notch (Morgan Sammons, John Preston). A school in Ca. nobody has ever heard of called Ryokan, has had very high EPPP pass rates and has a solid program, but without big names and $ it will never get APA accreditation.
What other doctoral-level professions require a degree from a program which has accreditation through its primary membership society?
Some people go to the extreme and say stuff like "You might as well not go to grad school if you're not going to an APA accredited school"
And to go one step further, imagine telling your patients that you attended an unaccredited program. How do you justify to them that you are sufficiently competent if your training couldn't even meet the relatively low bar of attending an accredited program.That really is the best way to look at this. As others have said, some states will not grant you a license if you didn't go to an APA-accredited program. You certainly will not get an APA-accredited internship if you go to such a program, and many (if not most) employers won't hire you. The only situation where this would be a good idea is if 1. you're in a state that doesn't require accreditation for licensure, 2. you already have *a lot* of money to start a private practice, and 3. you won't need anyone to ever hire you because you'll be self-employed (and therefore your internship could be anywhere).
Any thoughts about programs that may not pursue future APA accreditation? This applies to some of the clinical science programs (i.e. Berkeley and other similar programs) who currently have APA and PCSAS accreditation, but may not choose to pursue APA accreditation in the future. Are there any downsides to attending a program like that in regards to APA accreditation being potentially dropped?