AndyMilonakis said:
From my impressions, research can only help you. Not having done research will not hurt you. Not all pathologists do research.
I should add though, that when you interview at "big name" programs (or, for that matter, are a resident at one!
) research comes up a lot. People are consistently asking about it. Have you done research? If so, what? If not, would you like to? What are you interested in?
Research seems to be more important in path than in almost any other field. However, I would qualify that by saying it is not necessarily important for getting a residency spot. Research does seem to get you some more cache with pathologists though. If you are looking for a fellowship position research (of some kind) is a key part of the application process. If you want an academic position after residency, it is certainly important if not vital. Academic institutions like to hire people who bring in grant money.
Thus, as someone with very little research experience so far, it's kind of intimidating because I feel like I don't know where to start in looking to try out research. But the good thing about doing residency at a big name place is that there are always people around willing to help you through it and show you the ropes, pull you in on a project, etc. The thing is I have always been fascinated by research and wish I did more of it, I just always had different priorities up to this point. Residency will likely change this though.
In short though, like I said, don't necessarily worry about it for residency application purposes. Just understand that it will come up during interviews and they probably won't like it much if you say you aren't interested.