How important is sGPA compared to overall GPA?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Title says it all. Do med schools judge you based on your pre-req grades more than your overall gpa?

There is a chart floating around here somewhere that basically lists what adcoms rank as most important to least important when viewing applicants. Unless I'm mistaken (and I could be b/c I've been doing linear regressions on dead smokers for the last 2 hours), sGPA was the number one thing they considered.
 
There is a chart floating around here somewhere that basically lists what adcoms rank as most important to least important when viewing applicants. Unless I'm mistaken (and I could be b/c I've been doing linear regressions on dead smokers for the last 2 hours), sGPA was the number one thing they considered.

Which makes sense if you think about it. Med school is hardcore science.
 
@gonif
I see they moved some stuff around in the 2018 edition. I have only about 60 hours of clinical volunteering, but I work as a scribe for about 15 to 20 hours a week. Since the new chart ranks clinical volunteering as most important and paid clinical experience as a medium importance, what does this mean? I've always been told that the two were interchangeable
 
@gonif
I see they moved some stuff around in the 2018 edition. I have only about 60 hours of clinical volunteering, but I work as a scribe for about 15 to 20 hours a week. Since the new chart ranks clinical volunteering as most important and paid clinical experience as a medium importance, what does this mean? I've always been told that the two were interchangeable
It means altruism is good thing.
 
sGPA is definitely really important; IMO though it is troubling from an adcom persepctive if the sGPA and cGPA vary by a large margin.

Volunteering definitely matters a lot man.
 
@gonnif I understand the difference between volunteering and paid experience. As I said, I have about 60 hours clinical volunteering, nearly 1500-2000 hours scribing, about 400 non-clinical volunteering (of a nonprofit I started), and 75 shadowing, some with a PCP. I have been told by @Goro among others in the past that this clinical volunteering suffices, as I have ample paid clinical experience as well as non-clinical volunteering.
 
And you have been told wrong.

scribing is a paid clinical experience you do for yourself
Volunteering is something you do free for others
But @gonnif, surely just because it was paid doesn't mean one couldn't have reasons other than doing clinical work "for themselves," i.e., at the benefit of no one else? I understand that the "paid" aspect makes it seem less altruistic, but I know—from my experience—that I didn't do clinical work for two years just for the money; in fact, it was mostly "for others," just like my clinical volunteering.

I'm being pedantic, but one could show altruism in the absence of clinical volunteering with non-clinical volunteering, no? (Assuming that they have paid clinical experience, because obviously that, the clinical experience itself whether paid or not, is necessary.) Again, I know it'd be better to just have both, but I'm just disagreeing with the bolded statement.

...Then again, maybe my experience is a little skewed, because I was actually working patients up, taking histories, conducting diagnostic exams and etc., so a scribe's experience may not be as substantial? Idk, that pair of statements just seemed a little too black and white.
 
Top