How is the verbal in the real deal compared to the AAMC practice tests?
I find the practice qustions to be ambiguous and difficult to interpret sometimes..im hoping ht real deal isnt so hard
also, in terms of physics, how much of that stuff in solenoids/toroids and all that i found in the syllabus will actually be on it? I dont want to waste time on that crap! Also, is it just me or do u guys think the real test is mostly understanding hte passages, applying basic concepts and ocassionally doing problems/being required to know specific knowledge? I do worse on the company tests..kaplan/EK/etc. than I do on the aamc tests...im hoping that i dont have to wrry about that!
I find the practice qustions to be ambiguous and difficult to interpret sometimes..im hoping ht real deal isnt so hard
also, in terms of physics, how much of that stuff in solenoids/toroids and all that i found in the syllabus will actually be on it? I dont want to waste time on that crap! Also, is it just me or do u guys think the real test is mostly understanding hte passages, applying basic concepts and ocassionally doing problems/being required to know specific knowledge? I do worse on the company tests..kaplan/EK/etc. than I do on the aamc tests...im hoping that i dont have to wrry about that!