How LONG??

  • Thread starter Thread starter X
  • Start date Start date
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
X

X

How long does it take to send in a file for review. Just called Medical college of wisconsin, my file's been complete since september, but they have not even reviewed it yet. 5 months and they still haven't processed - why are these schools charging us if they are so bad at processing apps.

X
 
It may be that it hasn't been formally "reviewed." They may have looked at it, but due to GPA or MCAT or something they may not be "reviewing" or "considering" it yet... something to keep in mind. Or you could be right! Drives you nuts though, doesn't it?
 
I think Allygator's probably right. Your app's good enough to not reject at this time, but it hasn't been pulled into an interview pile yet.
 
I was complete in September with a highish GPA and lowish MCAT. I received an invite from MCW 1-2 weeks ago. I decided to decline it, though.
 
There are some schools at which I am in the pile that "not good enough to interview but we'll see." That I understand. But from the impression I got over the phone was they have never looked at the application.

X
 
Medical schools charge for applications for a simple reason: to discourage applications from people who have no chance at those medical schools. If they didn't it is a strong likelihood that many more aplicants would clog the system, creating ever more work and delaying everything and everybody. Admission offices are expected by the medical schools to partially pay their own way. If applicants create work, even if they will not even be seriously looked at, then the applicant will still have to contribute to the cost.

Applicants have to be selective where they apply. Having high grades and high MCATs does not mean the welcome mat will be out everywhere. Omitting the public medical schools where state residency is often an important factor, even the private medical schools have preferences for where their medical students will come from. Some of it has to do with their estimate of what grades means at different colleges, part of it has to do with letters of recommendation and their trustworthiness; letters coming from committees and advisors whom they know and trust usually carry more weight than lettters from faculty who are unknown to them.

Think about it. If you were running a business, say, and had to decide on whom of several job seekers to hire, if you wanted letters of recommendation wouldn't you give more weight to those from people, who, from past experience, you know and trust to be honest?

You should always try to imagine yourself on the other side of the desk. What would you do in the same circumstances, if the shoe was on the other foot, so to speak? Treat all grades as equal in meaning, no matter the circumstances and where earned, treat all letters as equally believeable no matter who the writer?

All of you know students with high grades you would not trust to shine your shoes, let alone be your physician. All applicants are equal, but some are more equal than others.
 
I'll be honest, if everything is going fine max 6 inches. The upside is that it's a good little bit more than that around, so it works out pretty well.
 
Gower,

Your argument is well thought out and I can tell you know what you are talking about, but unfortunately that argument doesn't apply here. Your argument holds if I was talking about admission to a certain school. Those factors are all important when you are granting a student admission. However, we are talking about even reviewing the file to begin with. Without the review you have no idea what the GPA, MCAT, who the letters are from, etc. Also I have no problem with medical schools charging for applications (I think they shouldn't charge so much etc. etc.), but I understand that they have to charge. But they should be processing the apps etc. in a timely manner. They are charging for a service and that service is not being provided.

X
 
Top