Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Right. I would be less than pleased if I got charged $80 for an office visit. No, I do not think that, under a regular exam circumstance, is a fair, justifiable charge.
Meds, and diagnostics are fair (eye meds ARE potentially very expensive), however I will stand by my statement that $80 to see the doctor is ridiculous and kind of friggin pretentious.
I will also agree with Marsala and say that I would not go back to a doctor who charges that much for an exam fee. There are perfectly good vets who charge $50 and $60 fees.
Ok, so you don't think vets should charge much more than 50-60 for an exam.
Do you think vets should be paid more, considering their training, expertise, hard work and long hours?
Because the two thoughts clash quite a bit.
For the record, I totally agree that $180 is a lot of money. Its certainly not money that I generally have lying around. Which is why I strongly condone pet insurance, having a savings account for pet expenses, being able to borrow the money if nessercerry or not owning a pet.
FWIW I worked at a practice that charged $90 for an eye exam. It was a 1/2 hour allotted exam, so if anything (I feel) the exam fee should have been higher. Obviously, not all exams went that long - especially as the clinican handling them was very experienced, and many were simple cases.
To add more perspective, behavioural consults at the same clinic cost $250. This might seem like a HUGE amount, but it was a 2 hour exam with a veterinary behaviourist.