• Funniest Story on the Job Contest Starts Now!

    Contest starts now and ends September 27th. Winner will receive a special user banner and $10 Amazon Gift card!

    JOIN NOW
  • Site Updates Coming Next Week

    Site updates are coming next week on Monday and Friday. Click the button below to learn more!

    LEARN MORE

How Often Do Large AMCs Attempt to Legally Enforce Non-Compete Clauses?

Aether2000

algosdoc
15+ Year Member
May 3, 2005
4,211
2,220
346
Florida
  1. Attending Physician
A large AMC is in litigation with several anesthesia groups throughout Florida and some may leave the AMC. Some legacy anesthesiologists do not have a non-compete clause, but all of the more recent physicians do. How likely is an AMC to litigate to enforce the non-compete clause if they lose the contract with a hospital?
 

dannyboy1

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Aug 11, 2008
1,082
1,349
276
  1. Attending Physician
A large AMC is in litigation with several anesthesia groups throughout Florida and some may leave the AMC. Some legacy anesthesiologists do not have a non-compete clause, but all of the more recent physicians do. How likely is an AMC to litigate to enforce the non-compete clause if they lose the contract with a hospital?
For an individual provider switching jobs probably not so much. In this situation they will definitely try to enforce or get money from the hospital to let it go...
 

narcotics999

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Feb 19, 2008
532
382
266
  1. Attending Physician
For my N=1, one NY AMC did, against both physicians and CRNAs who stayed on after it lost the contract.

It got no $. The affected just had to work in another hospital of the new group. That hospital is outside the non-compete radius.
 
About the Ads

Pharmado

PharmaDo
7+ Year Member
Mar 5, 2012
312
306
216
Texas
  1. Resident [Any Field]
Weren’t the noncompetes enforced in Charlotte and in the Twin Cities? The AMCs don’t have a choice but to enforce them. The business model dissolves if they don’t.

The AMC (Mednax) ultimately released providers from the non-compete in the Twin Cities but only if they stayed on with the group that took over and only as part of a negotiation that essentially let the MEDNAX abandon all the other sites they had in the city as well. They did this so late in the process that many of the physicians and CRNAs had already left anyway. Since Mednax was going under anyways it’s hard to draw concrete conclusions from it to apply to other situations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

IMGASMD

Full Member
2+ Year Member
Jan 24, 2017
2,317
2,396
126
The AMC (Mednax) ultimately released providers from the non-compete in the Twin Cities but only if they stayed on with the group that took over and only as part of a negotiation that essentially let the MEDNAX abandon all the other sites they had in the city as well. They did this so late in the process that many of the physicians and CRNAs had already left anyway. Since Mednax was going under anyways it’s hard to draw concrete conclusions from it to apply to other situations.

What happened in Twin City? How long ago was this?
 

aneftp

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Mar 23, 2010
2,098
1,082
276
  1. Attending Physician
I’ve never understood the legality of non compete radius with pure anesthesia (non pain related practices). I understand non compete clauses not to take over own hospital we one works at for x company. I get that.

But since anesthesiologists and crnas do not bring their own patients. And are dependent on surgeons to bring cases. What exactly are anesthesia peeps competing against?

We are not bringing patients in. The non compete are bogus especially one that is broad and encompass the whole county (usually 20-30 mile radius). Courts have struck those down multiple times in various states. People have a right to seek employment elsewhere and not be forced to move.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

IMGASMD

Full Member
2+ Year Member
Jan 24, 2017
2,317
2,396
126
I’ve never understood the legality of non compete radius with pure anesthesia (non pain related practices). I understand non compete clauses not to take over own hospital we one works at for x company. I get that.

But since anesthesiologists and crnas do not bring their own patients. And are dependent on surgeons to bring cases. What exactly are anesthesia peeps competing against?

We are not bringing patients in. The non compete are bogus especially one that is broad and encompass the whole county (usually 20-30 mile radius). Courts have struck those down multiple times in various states. People have a right to seek employment elsewhere and not be forced to move.

From all that has explained to me. They just don’t care. They have a legal team on retainer, or in house counsel. They can afford to tie you up for months, years while you’re fighting. During that time they can garnish your wage, they can force you not working. What do they have to lose? If you have emergency fund for a year, sure. Most people starting off, probably don’t.

And like some people kept saying, this is the business model. Enough money to sue you or last longer than you. Game of chicken if you will.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

DirtDocMD

Full Member
2+ Year Member
Sep 29, 2018
262
492
116
I’ve never understood the legality of non compete radius with pure anesthesia (non pain related practices). I understand non compete clauses not to take over own hospital we one works at for x company. I get that.

But since anesthesiologists and crnas do not bring their own patients. And are dependent on surgeons to bring cases. What exactly are anesthesia peeps competing against?

We are not bringing patients in. The non compete are bogus especially one that is broad and encompass the whole county (usually 20-30 mile radius). Courts have struck those down multiple times in various states. People have a right to seek employment elsewhere and not be forced to move.

Hey, don’t sweat it (non-competes)!! I’m sure the ASA is working on it, just like they have with AMC’s and CRNA’s...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
About the Ads
This thread is more than 1 year old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.