Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
So I have been debating the various surgical subspecialties for a while now, and really haven't done much in the way of a decision. I am in my third year, almost halfway through, and have gone through gen surg and several of the subspecialties, but am still lost.
My perception of general surgery (correct me if I am wrong):
I like thinking about pathophysiology, I like big time procedures, like Whipples and transplants and CABGs. I know minimally invasive is on the rise, but I'd like to see a world that still has open field. I also like the adrenaline rush of timed procedures, when procedures really make a difference between life and death (ie trauma, transplant, etc). General surgeons seem intense, and I can be too, but sometimes, malignancy runs rampant, and the hierarchy is very well defined. The lifestyle, of course, is horrendous.
My perception of ortho surgery:
I like orthopods that I have met. They seem to be the kind of guys that are like me, ie they are normal. They kick back and relax, are approachable, make funny jokes even while rounding, and are generally easy to get along with. At the end of the day, maybe less procedures are life v. death, but this also allows some semblance of a better life in terms of less emergencies. Clinic is extremely rewarding as well; physical exam closely correlates to diagnosis and plans for further treatment. Unfortunately, bones and joints lack a little bit of the cerebral aspects of medical management; few of my ortho attendings knew much in depth about bread/butter medicine like heart attacks, HTN, stroke, etc.
When I spoke to a friend of mine matching in ortho, he said that he had similar issues in thinking gen v. ortho. He decided that joints, while inherently not as interesting, could be rewarding as well (he is thinking ortho onc). He also decided that the people he met in ortho were a much better fit, and I guess the balance for him swung in the ortho direction.
I was personally thinking that ortho trauma might involve aspects of general surgery that I enjoy, but I have little experience in this realm. If I could train as an orthopod and still do some of the general surgery procedures that trauma surgeons do, then I think I would have a great blend of both worlds. The question is, do ortho trauma surgeons handle the same kinds of cases that general trauma surgeons do? Do they get to tie vasculature, and fish for various bleeds, handling internal organs, etc? What exactly do they do in the trauma world?
And more importantly, how off am I on these perceptions? Can I find aspects of each in the other?
Appreciate any insight that can be offered.
My perception of general surgery (correct me if I am wrong):
I like thinking about pathophysiology, I like big time procedures, like Whipples and transplants and CABGs. I know minimally invasive is on the rise, but I'd like to see a world that still has open field. I also like the adrenaline rush of timed procedures, when procedures really make a difference between life and death (ie trauma, transplant, etc). General surgeons seem intense, and I can be too, but sometimes, malignancy runs rampant, and the hierarchy is very well defined. The lifestyle, of course, is horrendous.
My perception of ortho surgery:
I like orthopods that I have met. They seem to be the kind of guys that are like me, ie they are normal. They kick back and relax, are approachable, make funny jokes even while rounding, and are generally easy to get along with. At the end of the day, maybe less procedures are life v. death, but this also allows some semblance of a better life in terms of less emergencies. Clinic is extremely rewarding as well; physical exam closely correlates to diagnosis and plans for further treatment. Unfortunately, bones and joints lack a little bit of the cerebral aspects of medical management; few of my ortho attendings knew much in depth about bread/butter medicine like heart attacks, HTN, stroke, etc.
When I spoke to a friend of mine matching in ortho, he said that he had similar issues in thinking gen v. ortho. He decided that joints, while inherently not as interesting, could be rewarding as well (he is thinking ortho onc). He also decided that the people he met in ortho were a much better fit, and I guess the balance for him swung in the ortho direction.
I was personally thinking that ortho trauma might involve aspects of general surgery that I enjoy, but I have little experience in this realm. If I could train as an orthopod and still do some of the general surgery procedures that trauma surgeons do, then I think I would have a great blend of both worlds. The question is, do ortho trauma surgeons handle the same kinds of cases that general trauma surgeons do? Do they get to tie vasculature, and fish for various bleeds, handling internal organs, etc? What exactly do they do in the trauma world?
And more importantly, how off am I on these perceptions? Can I find aspects of each in the other?
Appreciate any insight that can be offered.