- Joined
- Sep 25, 2010
- Messages
- 114
- Reaction score
- 0
I'm using the TPR Bio book for content review (the ones they sell on Amazon that are supposedly identical to the Hyperlearning book as far as content review goes).
I then did some TBR Bio passages from the corresponding sections, and I got destroyed. A good chunk of the material just wasn't covered in TPR. For example, TPR did not go in depth about Beta oxidation, so when that passage came up, I couldn't really do it.
So, if I'm shooting for a 40+, exactly how thorough should I be for content review in Bio? Should I read TBR Bio instead of TPR? Or, are TBR's passages just exceedingly difficult?
I then did some TBR Bio passages from the corresponding sections, and I got destroyed. A good chunk of the material just wasn't covered in TPR. For example, TPR did not go in depth about Beta oxidation, so when that passage came up, I couldn't really do it.
So, if I'm shooting for a 40+, exactly how thorough should I be for content review in Bio? Should I read TBR Bio instead of TPR? Or, are TBR's passages just exceedingly difficult?