- Joined
- Dec 20, 2004
- Messages
- 30,872
- Reaction score
- 10,063
in every specialty there is a very different hierarchy of which places are tops, and you won't know it unless you are in or researching that specialty by talking to multiple clinicians in the field (and would pretty much reveal what specialty you are in by being knowledgable about the hierarchy). Generally you find out what places are tops by talking to academics in th field, it's a very word of mouth kind of thing. And it can change year to year based on moving faculty. Every one of the top ranked places has at least one specialty residency which is not similarly ranked in the field. Some have several. The fellowships all know this and the US News ranking for med schools isn't of much import to them-- you aren't going to get the same cache coming from X hospital in ortho as you might from X hospital in IM. There will be hospitals that you perhaps never heard of as a premed or even as a med student if you are applying in a different field that happen to be top ten in a given field. And so on.
Drizz claims to know the hierarchy for rads, but unless he did similar pre-application research for other specialties, he's just BSing about knowing the hierarchy in other fields. Again, he's been espousing the brand name is better philosophy pretty consistently since he was a premed, and hes pretty invested in that viewpoint. and yet the truth of the matter is that all US allo places end up being pretty good launching pads in every specialty, if you have the numbers. He downplays it as a mere " 40%" of slots, which honestly is probably closer to 60% of the slots that aren't going to folks who stay at their home school.
I also might point out that to some extent PDs have their own strong views on the training you get at your particular med school school than the brand name. I happen to know a very highly ranked med school whose grads aren't even interviewed anymore by one well regarded residency because a couple of years in a row of residents from that place turned out to be poorly trained headaches for the PD. so the prior years batch of grads probably plays a much bigger a role of how you are going to be regarded than the brand name might. I know residencies that are happy with certain schools residents and go back to the same well over and over again, and places that after a couple of weak years start getting the cold shoulder from PDs.
Drizz claims to know the hierarchy for rads, but unless he did similar pre-application research for other specialties, he's just BSing about knowing the hierarchy in other fields. Again, he's been espousing the brand name is better philosophy pretty consistently since he was a premed, and hes pretty invested in that viewpoint. and yet the truth of the matter is that all US allo places end up being pretty good launching pads in every specialty, if you have the numbers. He downplays it as a mere " 40%" of slots, which honestly is probably closer to 60% of the slots that aren't going to folks who stay at their home school.
I also might point out that to some extent PDs have their own strong views on the training you get at your particular med school school than the brand name. I happen to know a very highly ranked med school whose grads aren't even interviewed anymore by one well regarded residency because a couple of years in a row of residents from that place turned out to be poorly trained headaches for the PD. so the prior years batch of grads probably plays a much bigger a role of how you are going to be regarded than the brand name might. I know residencies that are happy with certain schools residents and go back to the same well over and over again, and places that after a couple of weak years start getting the cold shoulder from PDs.