Hi--
Short version: How strict are schools about their non-science prerequisites?
Long version: I'm applying with more than 130 undergrad credits, many of them non-science, and no degree. Many of the schools I'm applying to, however, "require" additional non-science courses I have not taken. For example, UNC wants 9 hours of foreign language and a PE course; I have 3 hours of foreign language and I didn't even know PE was taught in college. Similar problems appear with other schools; UCSF wants a public speaking course and an econ course, etc.
What does this mean, and how should I go about dealing with this? If I don't have these non-science reqs, will my application be rejected outright? Should I cram my Spring 2010 semester with a full load of non-science courses, to make sure I meet as many requirements as possible? Should I pick one school I think I have a realistic chance of getting into, and focus on meeting their non-science prereqs to the exclusion of other schools?
THANKS A LOT GUYZ
Short version: How strict are schools about their non-science prerequisites?
Long version: I'm applying with more than 130 undergrad credits, many of them non-science, and no degree. Many of the schools I'm applying to, however, "require" additional non-science courses I have not taken. For example, UNC wants 9 hours of foreign language and a PE course; I have 3 hours of foreign language and I didn't even know PE was taught in college. Similar problems appear with other schools; UCSF wants a public speaking course and an econ course, etc.
What does this mean, and how should I go about dealing with this? If I don't have these non-science reqs, will my application be rejected outright? Should I cram my Spring 2010 semester with a full load of non-science courses, to make sure I meet as many requirements as possible? Should I pick one school I think I have a realistic chance of getting into, and focus on meeting their non-science prereqs to the exclusion of other schools?
THANKS A LOT GUYZ