Ugh.
First thing's first, the example someone gave.
http://www.nature.com/cgi-taf/DynaPage.taf?file=/nm/journal/v7/n6/full/nm0601_648.html
Does it sound like MacKinnon devoted half of his time to the clinic? I mean, look at his own description of his work:
"I came from an electrical background, and then slowly using molecular biology we identified parts of the potassium channel, but without actually seeing them we knew it would be really impossible to understand how it worked. At that point I made the decision to study X-ray crystallography and to become good at it."
In other words, it sounds like he was interested in basic science from the get-go, a fact which can be verified by looking at his biography:
http://www.hhmi.org/research/investigators/popups/mackinnon_bio.html
"He completed medical residency at Beth Israel Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and
postdoctoral work at Brandeis with Christopher Miller. "
Evidently, MacKinnon *has* received the training that someone in the basic sciences ordinarily might have through his completion of postdoctoral work. And yes, this is an incredible accomplishment, making it the exception rather than the rule; most MD's haven't done postdocs, and most MD's are not suited to do research in the basic sciences (particularly the physical sciences, due to the lackluster education in physics/chem you ordinarily get as a premed -- remember 'physics for life science majors'?).
---
Now back to the nature of the MSTP program in general. Here's an excerpt from UCSF's interpretation of the NIH's goals for the program:
http://medschool.ucsf.edu/mstp/program/nih.html
"Graduates of the MSTP differ from most scientists in
having had the medical training required to investigate problems of disease in humans. They differ from most clinicians in having had
extensive background in the biological, chemical, physical, or behavioral sciences needed to bring the fundamental knowledge and insight of these disciplines into clinical investigation. The majority of the graduates go on to
careers in basic biomedical or clinical
research."
It certainly sounds like the aim of the MSTP program is mainly to produce researchers. Ask yourself this question: what does the NIH usually give grants for in the first place? Research. Wouldn't it make sense that the money they're pouring into you through the MSTP program is meant to help develop you into a competent *researcher* (albeit with the "ability to investigate disease in humans", hence the purpose of the MD).
---
Originally posted by pathdr2b
I really pitty you but more than that, I pitty your future patients of color. I've rarely said this but hopefylly you'll never get the chance to practice on anyone. You're a racist plain and simple.
Nice job pulling the race card when you can no longer make a cogent argument (for the record, I had no idea as to the nature of your ethnicity when I made that post; it just seemed to be a common example of 'altruism' which people liked to cite). Maybe you should go read some of my other posts about AA. You'll end up concluding that it's actually *you* who's perpetuating the racism in this country because you utilise race to compensate for your personal inadequacies (of course, racism *did* exist here in the first place but as a country we've tried hard to get rid of it; ironically, it's the minorities who keep bringing it back up). Not that this isn't common -- look at all the obese people who want to sue the fast food chains -- but I suggest that you go look in the mirror sometime before you start throwing your troubles onto someone/something else.
This will be my last post in the thread.