As a student using dog cadavers for class, I would prefer that they came from shelter dogs that were already being euthanized than having dogs bred specifically for my learning. I would prefer even more that they came from a donation program because I understand the issues with community trust and corruption that can potentially occur with shelter sourcing. But having a dog live and die just so I can cut it up does not seem ethical when there are other options.
FWIW Penn's anatomy dogs are shelter dogs that were already going to be euthanized (not a shelter from around here, though). My group's dog had obvious serious trauma (multiple broken bones and abdominal bleeding) so we thought she was probably euthanized so she would not suffer.
Not in vet school yet, but when I visited Tufts last fall, the cadavers used in their anatomy lab were all donated by owners whose pets had been euthanized or had otherwise passed away at their clinic.
I suspect the cats that we dissected in undergrad were shelter euths, as our group got stuck with a very young (and adorable
🙁) kitten covered in flea dirt (possible feral?), no obvious anomalies... I couldn't see him having been purposefully bred for dissection.
Are there schools out there that are actually doing otherwise when there are so many options that don't involve breeding and killing for the purpose? I guess I'd naively assumed that everybody else was sourcing in similar ways...
Regarding HSUS, I don't fear
everything they do, but I do fear the way they seem to be capable of mainstreaming themselves in ways that more blatantly AR groups like PeTA can't get away with. Some of the shoddy legislation they support is fear-worthy, IMO, because once it passes and people come to the realization that 'hey, maybe this wasn't such a great idea'... good luck trying to get it off the books. I'm not a fan, and they won't be receiving any support (monetary or otherwise) from me. No love for Pacelle, either.