Hybridized/Unhybridized orbitals

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

foxi

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I stumbled upon this problem:

"The s and p orbitals of Pb are poorly energetically matched, and do not noticeably hybridize. In Pb(II) compounds, the two remaining electrons on Pb reside in an unhybridized s orbital, and bonding utilizes only the p-orbitals. In gaseous PbCl2, what is the approximate angle between the Pb—Cl bonds?"

Answer is ~90 degrees. Can anybody explain why this is so? I figured that the Lewis Dot would look something like lead flanked by two chlorides, with a single lone pair, thus approximating a bent Nitrite type molecule with angle of ~120.
 
Lewis dot structures do not show 3D space very well. Not to mention that wouldn't satisfy the octet rule. Metals bond funny - at least from the perspective of what you're taught in gen chem. But all you need to answer the question is in the question stem. The s orbitals don't hybridize, so bonding only occurs with the p-orbitals. Remember that there are three p-orbitals, which are all mutually-orthogonal to each other: px, py, and pz. So if you only bond with these, then the bonds must also be orthogonal to each other - orthogonal = 90 degrees.