Hysterectomy question

Started by Zarniwoop
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

309 not justified for h/o CIN1

But any uterus resected for benign disease with opportunistic salpingectomies which is happening more and more attached to uterus (not separate parts) - 307 is certainly justified
 
309 not justified for h/o CIN1

But any uterus resected for benign disease with opportunistic salpingectomies which is happening more and more attached to uterus (not separate parts) - 307 is certainly justified
I also don't think it is justified, but how can you prove that APS's guidance is in the wrong?
Are insurance companies rejecting the 309 code?