I know this has been asked ad nauseum on this forum, but I still haven't really seen a straight answer: is the detail-oriented style of Kaplan any help at all for boards?
Allow me to clarify my question by hi-jacking my own thread. When I do UW, I do some bonehead moves that make me get a Q wrong. But fundamentally, the fact they are testing is in my knowledge base. Just a problem with critical thinking. I feel like UW doesn't really go beyond the scope of primary source material (RR Path, FA, Kaplan series, HY books, etc).
However when I do some Kaplan Qbank sample Q's, the utter detail is mind blowing. They are much less conceptual and much more straight-fact based.
So, to re-state my question: would using Kaplan Qbank to learn these tiny little minutiae be a waste of time? People say that the real exam is 'easier' than UW, which I find to be a lot less brain-frying than Kaplan to begin with.
I will now duck and cover to prepare for the flame throwers who will be up in arms over me essentially asking 'Kaplan Qbank vs UW' for the umpteenth time.😱