fitz said:I don`t know what to do.Anyone can help me out???
fitz said:I `ve start PBl session about 2 month ago and I hate it .Attending it is a stress for me.I`m quiet along the session.In addition ,the PBL is evaluate whether you are active or not for viva.I don`t know what to do.Anyone can help me out???
superdood68 said:you should have looked at the school's curriculum before you took the acceptance.
ear-ache said:Easy... No one has any idea what PBL experience is really like until your immersed in it.
I thought PBL would be cool; a great way to learn the material and say out of lecture halls. Instead it was mostly people who wanted to monopolize the discussions to share their own personal experiences about medical topic 'X' and inflate their own fragile egos in the process. It was painful putting a lot of hard work & research into your topic/objective only to have your fellow group members spend 30sec copying & pasting Harisons Online. But I survived my two years of it and you will too. Just suck it up and get through it. The clinical years are soooooo worth the pain of PBL, and besides, many PBL programs have higher USMLE scores than traditional programs.
Blake said:Seems like our PBL is slightly different. You get graded on your PBL performance ? We only get either ''genius/great/good/needs to speak a bit more'' kind of comments. Is there a numerical grade in some PBL schools ?
Anyway, from my albeit limited PBL experience, people who never speak are either incredibly shy, still drunk from last night med party, or they just don't know the material well enough. (I can hear the flames coming right at me. *ducks* ). I'll admit that I end up speaking a lot during my PBL sessions, but here's the thing, it's all a matter of respect and common sense, which doesn't seem to be that common lately. Look, if we're all supposed to talk about the pathophysiology of a disease and there's like a 10 second silence, of course I'll start talking to break the ice and get this thing started. And then magically, everyone starts adding their piece of info and we're working as a group.
If a subject was discussed superficially, me and others will try to get in deeper into the material. Whenever someone speaks, you let them talk and when they're done, you can ask more questions or add some details. It's not about being a gunner, it's about doing your job as a med student. Of course some people will perform better than some others, but hey, that's life. There's still a way for everyone to be a winner in this PBL experience. Anyway, I've never received complaints by anyone, and we get evaluated by our whole PBL group and our PBL attending or resident, so you can already drop the '' you're a lame gunner. I hate your guts and hope you die in an horrible way'' stuff. It's old and childish.
These are my 2 cents. Sorry to hear you're hating this. What makes you stress about it ? Maybe some kind of advisor can help you at your school. G'luck !
Favorite gunner out 😳
Blake said:My post wasn't targetting anyone in particular. My bad if it seemed that way. It's just that the term gunner gets thrown way too easily these days. Anyway, I see your point, but our PBL seems to be different. We don't have a concept of workload divided between students. We learn all the same things and then we discuss it as a group. From what you're saying, I get the impression that someone will study chapter 1 while another student studies chapter 2 and they all share their info in the next PBL session. Is that right ? Honestly, this doesn't sound like much fun, and it does look more stressful.
robotsonic said:I chose my medical school partly because I liked the focus on PBL that it had. Now that I'm a fourth year, I can say that PBL was an almost complete waste of time.
And it was not because of the "gunners" or whatever. It was because we spent many hours discussing and giving presentations on crap that doesn't matter. We would spend an entire week on one case, and since each person in the group had to present a couple of topics each week, that meant really having to stretch to come up with topics. During first and second year, I kind of felt like this was a bit ridiculous and a waste of time, but once I got to clinical years I realized that it was really ridiculous and a huge waste of time. I think my time would have been better spent just studying on my own.
I will grant that learning in small groups is often very useful. But instead of spending an entire week on one case and forcing yourself to think of bizarre things to discuss, why not go over a few cases each day? For example, the preceptor would hand out a sheet with three case scenarios on it, and over the course of an hour or two, the group of 10 students would discuss the differential diagnosis, work-up, and possible treatment options. This would be extremely useful, and would be much better preparation for the wards and for step 1.
marooner said:i have a hard time looking for answers for the problems. you have to read lot of books just to anwer a single question. and those books ranges from anatomy, to internal medicine, and even medical journals!
robotsonic said:I think that is one of the points. In fact, the only benefit I think I got from PBL was all that practice searching for journal articles.
To njbmd, you said your pbl groups did well on step 1 and residency... does this mean that you were with a group for their entire time in med school? During my first and second years, the facilitator (and the students in the group) changed about every month.