- Joined
- Jun 12, 2012
- Messages
- 500
- Reaction score
- 73
The summer before I began college, and the summer between freshman-sophomore year, I worked at A&F. After all the controversy lately, should I just leave it out?
The summer before I began college, and the summer between freshman-sophomore year, I worked at A&F. After all the controversy lately, should I just leave it out?
You'll probably have to explain, why, as one of the beautiful people, you've decided to spend the best years of your life buried under books instead of modelling and having sex and other beautiful people things 😕
I would include it. They won't look down on you for it; it was a retail job at a clothing store that happens to have an offensive CEO. Not your problem.
Was the whole 'offensive thing' that he didnt want to make A&F clothing for fat chicks?
Haha...yes...
I'll probably get flamed for this, but I dont think its necessarily a bad thing..
Companies like Gucci, Prada, or Versace have really high prices to target their consumers to the celebrities and the rich, thus removing the poor people.
Weight is just another specifier, much like income level.
And IDK about you, but I dont want to see overweight girls in clothes 3 sizes too small for them. we already have this epidemic with yoga pants.
And IDK about you, but I dont want to see overweight girls in clothes 3 sizes too small for them. we already have this epidemic with yoga pants.
IDK about you, but I dont want to see overweight girls in clothes 3 sizes too small for them. we already have this epidemic with yoga pants.
The summer before I began college, and the summer between freshman-sophomore year, I worked at A&F. After all the controversy lately, should I just leave it out?
You'll probably have to explain, why, as one of the beautiful people, you've decided to spend the best years of your life buried under books instead of modelling and having sex and other beautiful people things 😕
I'll probably get flamed for this, but I dont think its necessarily a bad thing..
Companies like Gucci, Prada, or Versace have really high prices to target their consumers to the celebrities and the rich, thus removing the poor people.
Weight is just another specifier, much like income level.
And IDK about you, but I dont want to see overweight girls in clothes 3 sizes too small for them. we already have this epidemic with yoga pants.
I'll probably get flamed for this, but I dont think its necessarily a bad thing..
Companies like Gucci, Prada, or Versace have really high prices to target their consumers to the celebrities and the rich, thus removing the poor people.
Weight is just another specifier, much like income level.
And IDK about you, but I dont want to see overweight girls in clothes 3 sizes too small for them. we already have this epidemic with yoga pants.
I've been at hollister for a while too, are you putting the title as "model" or just something like sales representative? Even though it's technically called model, I don't want it to sound stupid hahaI also used to work for Hollister, which falls under Abercrombie's company. I'm keeping it in my application because I ended up working there for 2 1/2 years (long-term commitment, eh?). The general consensus seems to be that no matter how whimsical, you should include any jobs you hold. I really can't say I'm entirely surprised by the CEO, the entire time I was working under their company it didn't really strike me as a "wholesome" brand image...
So...you think they should sell it in plus sizes, then? Cuz if it's only available in an 8, more people will squeeze into it than if the 12 is available!
Da fuq?
Yoga pants are proof that God wants man to be happy.
I've been at hollister for a while too, are you putting the title as "model" or just something like sales representative? Even though it's technically called model, I don't want it to sound stupid haha
Ladies on welfare with Versace bags and Gucci shoes say otherwise![]()
"Sales associate". My friends already already get a good laugh about the title "Model" I can only imagine what AdComs would think.I've been at hollister for a while too, are you putting the title as "model" or just something like sales representative? Even though it's technically called model, I don't want it to sound stupid haha
This thread is hilarity.
TBT I actually prefer american eagle apparel, although I hate being superficial.
I had to put Victorias Secret "Model" on mine.... They didn't call us sales representatives!
Interesting that no one attacked VS for not making bras larger than DD....
I'll probably get flamed for this, but I dont think its necessarily a bad thing..
Companies like Gucci, Prada, or Versace have really high prices to target their consumers to the celebrities and the rich, thus removing the poor people.
Weight is just another specifier, much like income level.
And IDK about you, but I dont want to see overweight girls in clothes 3 sizes too small for them. we already have this epidemic with yoga pants.
This thread is hilarity.
TBT I actually prefer american eagle apparel, although I hate being superficial.
I agree, I still like the fit of AE polo's the best.American Eagle has good clothes too. I'm also partial to H+M...mainly cause I also find clothes that cater to short people as well 😛
Man, I bet you got a lot of interviews....
I agree with this. The only mistake the CEO made in my eyes was being honest. I cited the Nike example where they also have a target demographic that excludes poor people. Class and size are just two factors that companies utilize when making their brands. Furthermore, in my experience, A&F actually runs their sizes a little bigger than other companies. So even though I am usually a small or even a medium at other places, here I have to wear an XS to get the same fit.
Thank you! Finally a girl who agrees.
Every time I try to explain this to a girl, they think I'm a douchebag for being shallow...
When I get called that then I dont sugar coat it anymore. I tell them that they are muffin-topping or that their rolls are showing and might cause temporary blindness...
Saying that people should wear clothes that fit ≠ people above a certain size shouldn't wear our clothes because we only like a certain demographic.
And anyone who thinks Nike is not targeting the poor demographic is kidding themselves. People actually save up for their Nike kicks.
oh rly?
I bet those poor people have a lot more Nike gear than their rich counterparts...
saving up for nike kicks isnt the same thing as a rich person going in and buying all nike gear..
Same thing with high end designers... you might have one piece of clothing but the richer demographic will have a lot more of it and thus will be more associated with it than a poor person with just one article from that designer..
I agree, I still like the fit of AE polo's the best.
Kinda doubt "man" is the proper term.![]()