I would have to agree with most of the people in this forum who would not go into medicine again if they had a chance to do it all over again.
As a current undergraduate, my future goal is to cure a genetic syndrome. For example, Down syndrome, DiGeorge syndrome, etc. So, I spent my freshman year of college looking at the options that I have that would put me in the best position to reach my goal. I then spent some time in a local lab that deals with genetic research (using mice). I found this experience to be good, but was not sure if just working in a lab doing the research with no patient contact would be my best path. Therefore, I spent the rest of my freshman year contemplating what my best option was. During the summer of my freshman year I was thinking that doing a PhD in Molecular Genetics would be the best option for me. However, I then talked to a professor about this and the professor mentioned that I could do an MD/PhD. So, I looked into the MD/PhD and it seemed interesting and could possibly bet the best option for me. But being a transporter at a local hospital for the last two and a half years made me question the value of an MD/PhD for me. I was thinking to myself, I want to cure a genetic disorder, why would I want to be a part-time clinician and order CT scans, x-rays and echos when I would need to be in the lab doing the research to cure the genetic syndrome? Thus, during the first months of this year I started to research about clinical genetics. After doing so, I spent 40 hours shadowing a couple of clinical geneticist. While shadowing the two doctors, I became hesitant to becoming a clinical geneticist for the following reasons: I felt that every follow up that we did was not going to get me in the position to cure a genetic syndrome-it seemed like a waste of time-little to no value came out of the follow ups. However, I was intrigued by the challenge of diagnosing genetic syndromes. However, the average time spent doing a patient consult for a clinical geneticist is about 45 minutes to 1 hour. I was impressed with the depth of knowledge that the genetic counselors have and how much they get to actually discuss to the patient about genetic syndromes. I was not impressed with how little a clinical geneticist actually talks to the patient about genetic syndromes. For example, most often the patient has no idea what a gene even is. How can I talk about genome instability, DNA repair, siRNAs, RNAi, transcription, regulation, turning genes off and on, X-inactivation and imprinting when just about every patient has now idea what the DNA double helix is. Therefore, most of the clinical geneticist and genetic counselor cant really say all that much to the patient. What value would I get out of this to help me cure a genetic syndrome? The only value that I would get out of going to medical school to help me cure a genetic syndrome would be anatomy. But why go 115,000 dollars in-depth to get an MD or an MD/PhD when the only class that I would get a value out of the medical school would be the anatomy class. Therefore, I have decided to get a PhD in Molecular Genetics and a possible MS in Genetic Counseling. This way I could do genetic counseling and do research to help me cure a genetic syndrome. After my shadowing of the Medical Genetics Department, I felt that the genetic counselors get more involved with the patients then do the clinical geneticist.
Some of the things that I have noticed as being a transporter at a hospital that I tell people is that a lot of the time the doctors dont even see the patient, when the doctor does see the patient, they only spend a couple of minutes with the patient (in most cases). So much of what a doctor can do is controlled by insurance companies and drug companies, not so much by what the doctor wants to do. I think that less and less people are seeing doctors these days for many reasons. You dont have to be a doctor to be educated about preventive medicine. Why are there so many patients that are always comming back to the hosital year after year when doctors want to help them out and cure their illness? It just isn't like that.
I have decided to get a PhD in Molecular Genetics and possibly also get an MS in Genetic Counseling. I have done some internet searching and have not been able to find a person that does both genetic counseling and genetic research with an MS/PhD. Im not sure about the MS yet though. I could do a private genetic counselor practice and do the research with genetic syndromes.
Spending five years in a residency and four years in medical school and two more years in a fellowship does not put me in the position I want. Why go in 115,000 dollars in-depth in todays economy if you can find a rewarding and fulfilling career outside of being controlled by insurance and drug companies. Instead I can start working on curing a genetic syndrome right at the start of my PhD by working in a lab that does research with genetic syndromes. Just about every person I have talked to about this has told me to get an MD instead of PhD, but I see more value in the PhD over the MD.
Doctors dont help and save as many lives as a lot of people think. Most drugs dont even work, and in a lot of cases the drugs do more harm then good. As another poster said in this forum, we dont even have cures for the most common human ailments yet. I have heard numerous doctors say that dont have a clue how the drugs even work that they prescribe.