I'm worrying about RC section

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Kobebucsfan

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2010
Messages
736
Reaction score
16
on Topscore i always get 21+, b/c i just do search and destroy

on Acheiver, i keep getting 14s and 16s ( which means i get 20-26/50 right 😱)


is it safe to say the real DAT is in between topscore and acheiver in terms of difficulty ?
 
Ok good news achiever is just BS in everything it does except for PAT

Bad/good news your reading score is looking like a 21. Unless you are shooting for more than that, I don't know what to suggest. Your topscore reading should represent your actual score.
 
Ok good news achiever is just BS in everything it does except for PAT

Bad/good news your reading score is looking like a 21. Unless you are shooting for more than that, I don't know what to suggest. Your topscore reading should represent your actual score.

hannibal how does that make sense? when everyone says theres more inference and tone questions. which seems like topscore does not even cover!
 
hannibal how does that make sense? when everyone says theres more inference and tone questions. which seems like topscore does not even cover!

yeah topscore wall almost all search and destroy, i never read the passages at all and got 21+


is real DAT mix of search and tone ?
 
on Topscore i always get 21+, b/c i just do search and destroy

on Acheiver, i keep getting 14s and 16s ( which means i get 20-26/50 right 😱)


is it safe to say the real DAT is in between topscore and acheiver in terms of difficulty ?


I just took my DAT today, and it was nothing like topscore in terms of both the type of questions asked the actual passage. The RC on the real exam was not nearly as detailed as topscore and unlike topscore, i got a LOT of tone/inference questions.. and while the passages were not as detail oriented, they were longer. (my second passage was 17 paragraphs). Luckily, my third passage I was able to answer the questions with prior knowledge of the topic. But I read the passages before answering and would have been seriously f****d if i hadn't. I got a 23 AA but only a 19 RC so I the only thing I would suggest is try to stay as calm as possible and try not to second guess yourself on your answer choice for the inference questions. I scored consistent 21's on topscore but got the 19 today.
 
I just took my DAT today, and it was nothing like topscore in terms of both the type of questions asked the actual passage. The RC on the real exam was not nearly as detailed as topscore and unlike topscore, i got a LOT of tone/inference questions.. and while the passages were not as detail oriented, they were longer. (my second passage was 17 paragraphs). Luckily, my third passage I was able to answer the questions with prior knowledge of the topic. But I read the passages before answering and would have been seriously f****d if i hadn't. I got a 23 AA but only a 19 RC so I the only thing I would suggest is try to stay as calm as possible and try not to second guess yourself on your answer choice for the inference questions. I scored consistent 21's on topscore but got the 19 today.

I took the DAT about 2 weeks ago and this is exactly what i am going to say.
I think they make it harder by adding more tone/"what can you add to the end of the paragraph" questions...

My 2nd passage was long too. 18 paragraphs.
 
I took the DAT about 2 weeks ago and this is exactly what i am going to say.
I think they make it harder by adding more tone/"what can you add to the end of the paragraph" questions...

My 2nd passage was long too. 18 paragraphs.

I said it in another thread but these tone/inference questions is likely the result that they test makers have caught on to the whole search and destroy methods used. Just like they caught onto the whole line counting for TFE in PAT.

One would have to be naive think they do not have people on the forums and other forums seeing strategy used. S&D I guess defeats the purpose. It became less reading and how good are you at looking for keywords.

You will get some that can be searched and destroyed but the bulk of my questions required me to think a bit. If you read the passage you can eliminate most of the choices.

the hardest one to me is gauging the authors opinion. Crack dat reading has those question. When someone is in between(don't love something, but don't hate it either) its hard to pick it up on paper, in person I can gauge a person's opinion much easier.
 
Guys I'm so scurred of this. I think I will have to attend the Derek Zoolander Center For Children Who Can't Read Good And Wanna Learn To Do Other Stuff Good Too. It would probably help! 👍
 
ughh this is horrible news. i scored 22 on RC my last DAT and that was pure search & destroy...
what can be used to practice these inference questions???
 
You guys got me all wrong. I am not saying that topscore is better than achiever in RC but achiever is so hard and intimidating than topscore, it is worthless in studying. When you are studying in that final week and your nerves are already at a wreck you want materials that will help you not make you worry more. More confident people on their tests do well on their tests. I am saying this about achiever because it is unnecessarily harder.

As for tone/inference questions and where you can get practice:

2 books:

1) Examkrackers 101 Verbal
2) Examkrackers Verbal reasoning/math

Both are MCAT resources but these passages are well covered in the art of tone and inferring. Study about half of those and you are golden for the test.
 
You guys got me all wrong. I am not saying that topscore is better than achiever in RC but achiever is so hard and intimidating than topscore, it is worthless in studying. When you are studying in that final week and your nerves are already at a wreck you want materials that will help you not make you worry more. More confident people on their tests do well on their tests. I am saying this about achiever because it is unnecessarily harder.

As for tone/inference questions and where you can get practice:

2 books:

1) Examkrackers 101 Verbal
2) Examkrackers Verbal reasoning/math

Both are MCAT resources but these passages are well covered in the art of tone and inferring. Study about half of those and you are golden for the test.

Lol, Exam cracker is OVERKILL for DAT.

If you can ace the examcrackers verbal, you'll get 30 for sure on the DAT RC.

The passages I got on the DAT RC's were simpler, written in laymen terms (Think NY times or economist).

The best study material for what I saw is probably crack the DAT reading, where there are more inference/tone type of questions.
 
I got a 23 on RC.
Passage 1 was about the link between exercise and mental health, passage 2 was about NMDA/AMPA receptors, passage 3 was about cancer and genetics. I honestly do think that I lucked out. The passages were extremely easy to read through (but I am a pretty fast reader), and most of the questions were, as you guys term it, search and destroy. Also, for each of my passages, I got a question asking "what is the appropriate ending sentence to the passage?" I finished with 10 minutes to spare.

I didn't practice RC; why? DAT achiever RC made me want to cry. My practice score was an 18, 17, 16, 17, and 15 (the last test was a confidence killer). I just told myself, screw DAT achiever. Just be calm, look for the answers, and you will be fine.

There are a lot of techniques out there for helping you through RC, and while a lot of books say that it's not necessary to be a fast reader, that's a bit inaccurate, at least that's what I think. You NEED to be a fast reader and be good at remembering where things are. Doing the whole 'writing down key ideas from each paragraph' thing that Kaplan recommends did NOT work for me today. I felt like I was eating up time, when I could be reading and understanding.

On test day, I ended up going through all the questions, gradually reading the paragraph that my answer was contained in, until I ended up basically reading the entire passage. This is a very good technique for me, because you end up doing two things at once, and you get a general feel for the passage in general.

Word of caution: the passages I got on my DAT were highly technical and fact based. Furthermore, I enjoyed reading them (-_-...science nerd). Like I said, I really lucked out. On the other very far side of the spectrum, I know first hand the kind of panic you can get from reading a paragraph of philosophical opinions about old Renaissance art and the first question is a "what can be inferred from _____". These type of passages require a different strategy. Perhaps if I had gotten that kind of a passage, I would be more inclined to write down some choice words for each paragraph.

My only conclusive advice really is to STAY CALM. You get to the first question, it's something that's not an easy find, MARK IT, and move on. I guarantee that if you are able to glean the general gist of the passage, you will be able to answer question 1 by the time you get to question 10. DO NOT let the clock scare you. I would say, as long as you can answer 17/20 of the questions in 20 minutes, you're golden. I think that after you finish the first passage, an auto-mode switches on in your brain and you're able to do passage 2 and 3 a bit faster because you're IN THE ZONE and know what to do. I'm not saying that everybody is going to have 10 minutes leftover after finishing passage 3, but even having 5 minutes left to go through the ones you weren't sure of is good enough.

I'm sorry this was so long. If anybody has any questions, please PM me; I'll be more than happy to answer any questions. 😀
 
Lol, Exam cracker is OVERKILL for DAT.

If you can ace the examcrackers verbal, you'll get 30 for sure on the DAT RC.

The passages I got on the DAT RC's were simpler, written in laymen terms (Think NY times or economist).

The best study material for what I saw is probably crack the DAT reading, where there are more inference/tone type of questions.

LOL I hate to admit in but IRL I like to think of life in the worst case scenario. I feel like if you shoot for a 30 on the RC then you will get something good like at least an 18 haha
 
I plan to read a heavy science article the morning of my exam. it will warm up my brain for what's to come, plus I plan to do a massive review the night before and the morning of. I treat long exams like marathons... you train for months, but you still have to warm up the morning of... you cant just go in cold and pull a muscle. I remember the last time I took a big test like the DAT and while everyone else was b'sing in the room, I was reading massive passages (mind you this was before a long and hard 3 hour reading exam.) when the test came, I felt in the zone and it was if I was just running with it. I scored the highest percentile on half the exam (2 sections), then I ever did on practice exams and it was a significant boost. I directly attribute it to "warming up my brain." the morning of.
 
EXPECT to score lower on the RC than what you got on topscore.

TS 1: 29
TS 2: 25
TS 3: 27

DAT: 23

Zero tone/inference questions on topscore but I got hit with about 2 handfuls on test day.
 
I think the most important thing with RC is finding a strategy that works for you and sticking with it. I had to test drive a couple of strategies before I found one that worked best for me.

On the topscore tests I would score 19-21 on the RC sections but ended up getting a 23 on the actual DAT. Like people have already said just stay calm, do your thing that you've practiced, and you'll be just fine.
 
Topscore will give you higher scores (compared to your probable actual score) and Achiever will give you lower scores, for RC. The simple truth is you need neither of them. You don't even need to read the newspaper or articles to warm up. The actual RC is very simple. Decide which method you want to you use and practice timing. The passages are so vague and written in very easy, plain wording.
 
Top