You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Important ROL info
Started by WaveEquation
acgme.org/adspublic
acgme.org/adspublic
Thanks for the help!
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Wondering...if a program is 3 or 4 instead of 5...how big of a deal is that? I guess it probably depends on the reason? There are a few really good programs for which this is the case...
Wondering...if a program is 3 or 4 instead of 5...how big of a deal is that? I guess it probably depends on the reason? There are a few really good programs for which this is the case...
yea what happened with MGH? how do you find out the reason for their 3 year accreditation?
yea what happened with MGH? how do you find out the reason for their 3 year accreditation?
I think maybe the only way to find out is to actually ask the people in the program...not sure though. Not the easiest question to ask!!
yea what happened with MGH? how do you find out the reason for their 3 year accreditation?
could be that they are a workhorse program, too much of a good thing (case volume) can affect time studying on your own.
could be that they are a workhorse program, too much of a good thing (case volume) can affect time studying on your own.
🙄
Trying to scare ppl off, eh?
🙄
Trying to scare ppl off, eh?
How could you tell? By the way, I didn't interview there.
Its a way for the RRC to let you know of issues that may exist with the program (generic, usually) and set a timetable for their return.
Example: we had a 5 year accred when i showed up in 2006-7, RRC that year found some issues, knocked us to 2 year, came back in 2009, saw everything was legitimately fixed, and we were back at 5 year.
Its obviously an issue to not be 5 year if the program isnt working on fixing things, because long term complications can result, but its very unlikely that a top program wouldnt make it their #1 priority to fix any problems. Its probably better to come into a good program on 3-year cycle than on 5-year cycle, when you think about it.
Example: we had a 5 year accred when i showed up in 2006-7, RRC that year found some issues, knocked us to 2 year, came back in 2009, saw everything was legitimately fixed, and we were back at 5 year.
Its obviously an issue to not be 5 year if the program isnt working on fixing things, because long term complications can result, but its very unlikely that a top program wouldnt make it their #1 priority to fix any problems. Its probably better to come into a good program on 3-year cycle than on 5-year cycle, when you think about it.
FYI a single work hour violation is enough to keep a program from getting 5 years.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 11
- Views
- 7K
D
- Replies
- 17
- Views
- 4K
D