- Joined
- Oct 15, 2007
- Messages
- 330
- Reaction score
- 1
So I'm a big believer in ratemyprofessor to get a pulse on what people think of the professor for a lot of reasons. Contrary to popular belief, it's not just about finding the "easy" professors, and many of the comments are about how the class is so easy that they regret taking it because the students learned nothing. Good professors are worth their weight in gold because they test over what they teach and they don't focus on minutia or misleading questions with "best" answers when there are two or more that are technically correct.
Anyways, my Intro to Cell and Molecular Biology teacher is a real peach.
He spent the better part of three 50-minute classes over what science is, going on ad nauseum about how to test a hypothesis.
Took up an entire lab session having us watch "Race for the Double Helix", a mediocre B-film with almost no in-depth information on the subject.
Been five or more minutes late to half of the class periods and is so unprepared that it takes him ten minutes to set himself up at the beginning of the period essentially cutting the class time down by a third.
It took him five days to grade our exams which were 100% multiple choice.
The highest grade on his exam was 85% and there were five B's in a class of 30. This was due to a test that covered extreme minutia that was not stressed whatsoever. Example: we were supposed to "glance over chapter six to get the basic ideas" for the exam because he'd wasted so much time with meaningless fluff that he didn't have time to cover it. Six is the first chapter that even mentions organelles, sample question: Which organelle from the list has hydrolitic enzymes? Yeah, really basic idea that I would remember from glancing over the subject...
He stopped the class at ten minutes before the end to hand out our graded exams and decided that rather than give us time to go over them, he'd let his five-year old daughter hand them out, giving most of us less than 3 minutes to go over the questions we missed before we had to hand the tests back in.
The exam covered material that was first introduced this week in class.
There is no curve on the exam, no opportunities for extra credit.
Figuring the weight of the exam against his quizes, 80% of his class has a C or lower as of now. Statistically, only 2 of 30 have the possibility of currently holding a very low A, depending on their quiz grades.
He's a real nice guy even if he's oblivious to the afforementioned, but it still baffles me how someone can have a PhD and be unable to teach a basic college 101 course.
Anyways, my Intro to Cell and Molecular Biology teacher is a real peach.
He spent the better part of three 50-minute classes over what science is, going on ad nauseum about how to test a hypothesis.
Took up an entire lab session having us watch "Race for the Double Helix", a mediocre B-film with almost no in-depth information on the subject.
Been five or more minutes late to half of the class periods and is so unprepared that it takes him ten minutes to set himself up at the beginning of the period essentially cutting the class time down by a third.
It took him five days to grade our exams which were 100% multiple choice.
The highest grade on his exam was 85% and there were five B's in a class of 30. This was due to a test that covered extreme minutia that was not stressed whatsoever. Example: we were supposed to "glance over chapter six to get the basic ideas" for the exam because he'd wasted so much time with meaningless fluff that he didn't have time to cover it. Six is the first chapter that even mentions organelles, sample question: Which organelle from the list has hydrolitic enzymes? Yeah, really basic idea that I would remember from glancing over the subject...
He stopped the class at ten minutes before the end to hand out our graded exams and decided that rather than give us time to go over them, he'd let his five-year old daughter hand them out, giving most of us less than 3 minutes to go over the questions we missed before we had to hand the tests back in.
The exam covered material that was first introduced this week in class.
There is no curve on the exam, no opportunities for extra credit.
Figuring the weight of the exam against his quizes, 80% of his class has a C or lower as of now. Statistically, only 2 of 30 have the possibility of currently holding a very low A, depending on their quiz grades.
He's a real nice guy even if he's oblivious to the afforementioned, but it still baffles me how someone can have a PhD and be unable to teach a basic college 101 course.