- Joined
- Nov 14, 2008
- Messages
- 1,870
- Reaction score
- 3
Hi All
So, question for all you amazing anesthesiologists out there....this one, GASP, revolves around finances.
I've read lots of threads that talk about how poor payor-mix, and getting paid by certain populations (i.e. medicare, medicaid etc) gives pennies on the dollar when it's time to bill and collect for pp anesthesiologists. So, that when you do that 6 hour heart case, and the patient doesn't have Cadillac insurance, but rather medicare, you are kind of SOL...
Can someone explain to me then, the logic for the other age of the spectrum: pediatric anesthesiology? I have heard that, generally speaking, pediatric anesthesiologists don't make salaries comparable to other sub-specialties of anesthesia, CCM, CT, no idea about OB...
A couple of assumptions here: so, IF the kiddies, at large, have insurance, and they are not on medicare like the 85 y/o, but are rather on mommy or daddy's Blue Cross or AETNA, or Cigna, then...why don't pediatric anesthesiologists earn more - generally - than just about every other area of anesthesia?
So, to think empirically about this, and I understand a couple of assumptions about kids and insurance, and maybe types of insurance, need to be made, but would it not then follow that Peds Anesthesiologists "should" make more than CT who are doing "medicare" cases day in and day out?
Assumptions:
1) same amount of procedures as older peeps
2) greater % have insurance overall
3) greater % have BETTER/higher paying insurance plans as compared to CT or Neuro for example
4) that, in fact, Peds is an underpaid specialty compared to others.
If all those fall true, why are they not compensated accordingly? Are there extra-insurance reasons here? I was once with a CT guy and he tried to explain the UNITS payment situation. Does that not fall true for Peds as well, and if so, I'd think you'd have as much to do, time wise and procedure wise, on kids than the +65 surgical population. Maybe not for T&As all day...hmmm...
What gives? I am very interested in this explanation...
As always, thanks!
Back to books!
D712
So, question for all you amazing anesthesiologists out there....this one, GASP, revolves around finances.
I've read lots of threads that talk about how poor payor-mix, and getting paid by certain populations (i.e. medicare, medicaid etc) gives pennies on the dollar when it's time to bill and collect for pp anesthesiologists. So, that when you do that 6 hour heart case, and the patient doesn't have Cadillac insurance, but rather medicare, you are kind of SOL...
Can someone explain to me then, the logic for the other age of the spectrum: pediatric anesthesiology? I have heard that, generally speaking, pediatric anesthesiologists don't make salaries comparable to other sub-specialties of anesthesia, CCM, CT, no idea about OB...
A couple of assumptions here: so, IF the kiddies, at large, have insurance, and they are not on medicare like the 85 y/o, but are rather on mommy or daddy's Blue Cross or AETNA, or Cigna, then...why don't pediatric anesthesiologists earn more - generally - than just about every other area of anesthesia?
So, to think empirically about this, and I understand a couple of assumptions about kids and insurance, and maybe types of insurance, need to be made, but would it not then follow that Peds Anesthesiologists "should" make more than CT who are doing "medicare" cases day in and day out?
Assumptions:
1) same amount of procedures as older peeps
2) greater % have insurance overall
3) greater % have BETTER/higher paying insurance plans as compared to CT or Neuro for example
4) that, in fact, Peds is an underpaid specialty compared to others.
If all those fall true, why are they not compensated accordingly? Are there extra-insurance reasons here? I was once with a CT guy and he tried to explain the UNITS payment situation. Does that not fall true for Peds as well, and if so, I'd think you'd have as much to do, time wise and procedure wise, on kids than the +65 surgical population. Maybe not for T&As all day...hmmm...
What gives? I am very interested in this explanation...
As always, thanks!
Back to books!
D712