Internal ranking?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Foot Fetish

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
682
Reaction score
1,419
So, I will be attending a "Pass/Fail" medical school, but when I asked a current upperclassman if there is internal ranking, he answered "No, BUT they can calculate your rank if the residency program needs it."

To me, that sounds like there is an internal ranking, but the school is not transparent about it.

Thoughts?

Members don't see this ad.
 
That's a ranked system.

I can't find the post but I remember a few years ago, someone here got an email during the clinical years congratulating him on being the top x% of his class. It was a supposedly pass/fail school that doesn't rank and it caught him by surprise. I don't trust schools to begin with but that just sealed the deal for me.
 
If they "can" internally rank a person then it means they are keeping track of everyone's rank somewhere. To figure out someone's rank they'd have to have everyone's GPA or percentage calculated and organized in some way. To do that they'd have to keep track of those percentages or grades somewhere. Maybe they don't explicitly have a list of your ranking, but they're definitely keeping track of more than just whether or not you pass.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
That's a ranked system.

I can't find the post but I remember a few years ago, someone here got an email during the clinical years congratulating him on being the top x% of his class. It was a supposedly pass/fail school that doesn't rank and it caught him by surprise. I don't trust schools to begin with but that just sealed the deal for me.

Was it just at the begining of clinical years or after a few terms because I thought most schools left p/f for clinical years so by then you might be able to calculate a rank.
 
I go to a state MD school that claims to be pass/fail but they really aren't at all. You still get percentage grades on each exam and for each preclinical block as a whole (along with the class average). Also, both junior and senior AOA are very objective at my school and are determined almost solely using grades. 3rd year is H/HP/P and curved. I know of other schools which are nearly identical in format. I don't really get how they claim to be "pass/fail" in any way. I guess because they don't specifically put in your deans letter that person X is ranked x/100 in their class? My school was very sketchy about this whole deal when asked and they omitted and dodged quite a bit even when asked directly.
 
Wow, MSU really throws the bottom of their class under the bus. There's 3 descriptors for the top 95% while the bottom 5%, bottom 2%, and bottom 1% get their own descriptor. They might as well just give their actual class rank...
JC. Why would anyone think that's a good idea?

"We don't need to recognize the accomplishments of the top X percentile, but let's make damn sure everyone knows who's at the bottom!"
 
So, I will be attending a "Pass/Fail" medical school, but when I asked a current upperclassman if there is internal ranking, he answered "No, BUT they can calculate your rank if the residency program needs it."

To me, that sounds like there is an internal ranking, but the school is not transparent about it.

Thoughts?

You hit the nail on the head. In hindsight, I feel like all the commotion about Year 1-2 grading is overblown. At the end of the day, a majority of the schools have some variant of pass/fail. Some may have additional tiers to reward students for diligent work (H/P/F...H, HP, P, LP, F, etc)...Students at these schools may seem to not like such a system because it "promotes competition", but I feel like most the stress is made by students themselves. My school actually grades students with a 3 digit numerical value based on standard deviation from the mean with 500 being average. A lot of people freaked out and petitioned the system saying that the school's too competitive and the school itself really didn't care much because it wasn't like a big deal to them so they're changing it to accomodate requests which does nothing for students. At the end of the day, students will always be ranked internally. The exception to this is at notable schools (I think many ivies) who are very transparent about the fact that after P vs. F, grades are 100% confidential and thrown away. At most schools, however, there's something known as a Dean's Letter that needs to be written in your 4th year. The Dean's Letter is composed of things that make you special to promote your standing (Johnny served on the promotions committee and volunteered here etc.), but one of the goals of the Dean's Letter is to come up with an objective ranking of a student relative to his or her peers because residencies will always want to know such a juicy fact. Therefore, medical schools will keep your grades and rank you and then put you in some category. At my school it's something like top 5% is exceptional, top 10% is outstanding, top 25% is excellent, top 50% very good, top 75% is good, etc and that's going to be in the Dean's Letter. Therefore, does it really matter if schools give out grades after every exam? No...students just think it does because if they're not getting top 10% on every exam, it just gets to them...at the end of the day, what matters is what quartile you fall in (at my school). However, class rank and 1st year grades are very low on the totem pole of importance and things like Step exams, Clinical grades, and possibly research and LORs are just as important. OP, after you change your username, you should figure out how your school configures your dean's letter (is it truly a P or F stamp or is it a bunch of groups, or whatever) and make your moves from there. Also, even if it's just Pass or Fail, the next question to ask is how they determine AOA. If they say they say 1st and 2nd year has no influence on AOA, then you've found what in actuality is a "Pass or Fail" school and I can't be sure but I feel this is probably rare.
 
Last edited:
Wow, MSU really throws the bottom of their class under the bus. There's 3 descriptors for the top 95% while the bottom 5%, bottom 2%, and bottom 1% get their own descriptor. They might as well just give their actual class rank...


This is an exceptional resource for incoming medical students. Is there anyone I can contact to have this edited for my school? I think this should also be pinned if it isn't already.
 
This is an exceptional resource for incoming medical students. Is there anyone I can contact to have this edited for my school? I think this should also be pinned if it isn't already.
I don't think there's any way to update the document. It's a supplement to a published journal article.
 
Wow, MSU really throws the bottom of their class under the bus. There's 3 descriptors for the top 95% while the bottom 5%, bottom 2%, and bottom 1% get their own descriptor. They might as well just give their actual class rank...

Deans letter be like:

"This student is the dumbest A**hole we've got"
 
I don't think there's any way to update the document. It's a supplement to a published journal article.
The conclusion of the abstract says the following, so maybe it would be okay to edit especially if someone got premission:

"The authors recognize that this database is incomplete and that the individual institutions will alter their ranking system from time to time. But this database is offered in an open format so that it can be continuously updated by users."
 
Top