- Joined
- Dec 7, 2016
- Messages
- 421
- Reaction score
- 519
A few people I’ve spoken to have a theory that those who have more sites to rank end up at a site they ranked lower in order to accommodate for the applicants who have fewer sites to rank. They based this on observations of previous cohorts. For instance, students who had 5 or fewer interviews got their first choice while students who had 10+ interviews got their last, or second to last, choice. Of course there would be no way to prove if this theory is valid... I’m just worried about and now and hoping someone will know for sure whether or not this is accurate.
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile