Interview Invite Timing

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

contentlie868

New Member
2+ Year Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2020
Messages
5
Reaction score
3
I have seen a few threads discussing how IIs tend to be offered to more competitive/high stat applicants first. I have LM 83, decent (somewhat unique, imo) EC’s, submitted most secondaries mid-July to mid-August, but I have not received any IIs yet. I’m well aware stats are not everything, but I figured I would get a decent amount of love just based on my stats. Could this indicate my application may be less competitive than I thought?

Thank you.

Members don't see this ad.
 
1. It is still early.
2. There are other elements to your application (clinical exposure, volunteering, LOR, the ability to communicate well in writing, mission fit) that are essential to a successful application cycle. Schools will offer the first interviews to those they most want to recruit.
3. Are you sure your application is complete and not delayed waiting for a transcript or other elements?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Without a WAMC profile, we can't tell you anything about how competitive your application is, and you may be fooling yourself regarding your desirability. You could get an II after the holiday.

Even so, metrics won't be everything. It's still early.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Members don't see this ad :)
This is a long process. I don't allow any whining about not having an interview invite until the Friday after Thanksgiving (Nov 29 this year). That's three months from now.

Faculty reviewers are reading these applications as quickly as they can and sending recommendations to the admissions office. Someone there decides if you should be interviewed and puts you in the queue to get an invitation. Some readers are slower than others and if there are 35 to review in the next 2 weeks, some people might do 2-3 per day for 14 days and some might leave then all to the last 2 days. Either way, you might get reviewed 2 weeks later than someone else whose application arrived the same day. Or you might have been held back by luck of the draw, to be reviewed later because dumping 250 applications on a reviewer at one time and saying, please do at least 15-20 per week is not a good way to handle reviewers.

Now, you might have been reviewed and recommended for review but there are so many others that we'd be asking you now if you are available for dates in the first 2 weeks of November. A lot can happen between now and then and schedulers find that they get lots of calls and messages asking to reschedule. So, to cut down on those situations, they'll hold off until mid-October to propose dates in early November.

I hope this helps calm some of your concerns.

It is a long ride to Mars. (see sig line)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users
1. It is still early.
2. There are other elements to your application (clinical exposure, volunteering, LOR, the ability to communicate well in writing, mission fit) that are essential to a successful application cycle. Schools will offer the first interviews to those they most want to recruit.
3. Are you sure your application is complete and not delayed waiting for a transcript or other elements?
Thanks for the reply!
1. Yes very true :< I’m not currently concerned about getting 0 interviews total, but I am a bit confused as to why I haven’t received any yet
2. Yeah, I get that, but from my perspective all that is pretty solid. Several hundred hours each clinical, volunteering, leadership, ~50 hrs shadowing, over 1500 hrs research (basic and social science). Overall, somewhat cookie cutter, but there are a few unique-ish things. Not international, no IAs, nothing like that. I assume LORs are at least decent, and I think my writing is as well. PS was personal and creates somewhat of a theme with EC’s. No X-factors or super strong theme, so maybe that’s part of it?
3. Pretty sure! I have all the green checkmarks in all the schools’ portals, and I’ve received a complete email from every school.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
This is a long process. I don't allow any whining about not having an interview invite until the Friday after Thanksgiving (Nov 29 this year). That's three months from now.

Faculty reviewers are reading these applications as quickly as they can and sending recommendations to the admissions office. Someone there decides if you should be interviewed and puts you in the queue to get an invitation. Some readers are slower than others and if there are 35 to review in the next 2 weeks, some people might do 2-3 per day for 14 days and some might leave then all to the last 2 days. Either way, you might get reviewed 2 weeks later than someone else whose application arrived the same day. Or you might have been held back by luck of the draw, to be reviewed later because dumping 250 applications on a reviewer at one time and saying, please do at least 15-20 per week is not a good way to handle reviewers.

Now, you might have been reviewed and recommended for review but there are so many others that we'd be asking you now if you are available for dates in the first 2 weeks of November. A lot can happen between now and then and schedulers find that they get lots of calls and messages asking to reschedule. So, to cut down on those situations, they'll hold off until mid-October to propose dates in early November.

I hope this helps calm some of your concerns.

It is a long ride to Mars. (see sig line)
Thank you for this :)
 
if it makes you feel any better, submitted secondaries by mid august, Still waiting on interviews. You aren't alone :)
 
  • Like
  • Care
Reactions: 2 users
I have seen a few threads discussing how IIs tend to be offered to more competitive/high stat applicants first. I have LM 83, decent (somewhat unique, imo) EC’s, submitted most secondaries mid-July to mid-August, but I have not received any IIs yet. I’m well aware stats are not everything, but I figured I would get a decent amount of love just based on my stats. Could this indicate my application may be less competitive than I thought?

Thank you.
Patience is a virtue, the need for instant gratification is not.

Applications are not processed in chronological order of receipt.

Not singling out you OP, but SDNers are strongly advised to not have the mindset of "I send in my applications, where are all my interview invites?"
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Top