interview offered then charged with DWI

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
It's immoral to advise someone to be deceitful, given this situation.

I see your point about getting caught or not getting caught, but the OP did, in fact, get caught. And honestly, if the OP didn't get caught, they wouldn't have started this thread.

Be realistic...If the interviewers cared about those that drank when they were under 21, I dare say they probably would lose 90% of their applicants. I would like to think the number of drunk driving applicants is much, much less. Not to mention underaged drinking doesn't even come close to drunk driving.

I, too, get where you're coming from, but I think, as the OP's peers, we should demand a higher ethical/moral standard of ourselves. Dismissing a DWI as "just a misdemeanor" isn't helping anyone.

Underage drinking is a misdemeanor too broski.

regardless of which YOU think is worse, they are both equally misdemeanors...

and I'm "dismissing it as just a misdemeanor" because... oh yeah, that's exactly what it is :smack:
 
Top