Last edited:
Just wondering what the thoughts are on this?
If medical schools were worried about you being a "poor investment" because you have fewer years of career ahead of you, then medical schools would also have to stop accepting women.
Just wondering what the thoughts are on this?
When (hopefully) accepted, I will be 29 years of age starting school. I know there are always a couple of much older students in a class, but I'm wondering if medical schools will look on this unfavourably?
Will they think I'm too old to invest the time into training me, I won't graduate until 33-34, then depending on residency / specialty etc, I might not be an independent doctor until 40.
What do you guys think? Is there "ageism" in the admission process? Is it a big factor of consideration. Should I focus more on shorter residency? Would it be stupid to mention interest in surgery at my age, they might think I won't be an independent surgeon until 40.
Just wondering what the thoughts are on this?
When (hopefully) accepted, I will be 29 years of age starting school. I know there are always a couple of much older students in a class, but I'm wondering if medical schools will look on this unfavourably?
Will they think I'm too old to invest the time into training me, I won't graduate until 33-34, then depending on residency / specialty etc, I might not be an independent doctor until 40.
What do you guys think? Is there "ageism" in the admission process? Is it a big factor of consideration. Should I focus more on shorter residency? Would it be stupid to mention interest in surgery at my age, they might think I won't be an independent surgeon until 40.
hmmm.............. So I will be stating this year and will be 42 years of age when I start. Obviously didn't seem old to me. Relax, you are going to be fine. Just take one step at a time and do what you like to do and not because its short or long. God bless you.
Wow Indianarn, that is inspiring. Congrats! If all goes well I will be starting at 29.
If you don't mind me asking, what was your previous career? What was you motivation for switching career paths?
Thank for all the popcorn.
My point is that the argument for not investing in older students because of their limited career years in medicine is a very slippery slope... women on average also have fewer career years in medicine. It's a fact. And there is nothing wrong with this fact.
There may be some reasons for prohibiting older students from getting medical training (and I doubt this), but limited career years is not one of them.
When we have somebody die under the age of 60, we're all "My god, they're so young!" 30 is nothing.When did 30 become old????
I guess it is when you compare it to 22 and 23. Honestly, it's not young, but in the grand scheme of things: you.are.not.old.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz you win the most played out comment of the year award
My signature is cute, thanx. I like it because I am excited I was accepted to medical school and it conveys that sentiment.
& you ARE boring because you insist on bringing up a tired old topic that is just used to piss people off. And NO is not a valid topic unless you are a pathetic person who always has to pry into other peoples lives and judge, live your own life and try not to harm other people with your misogynistic baggage.
Why is it not a valid issue? You know it happens, and I think (I hope) we all agree that it should change. I'm not entirely sure what this reaction is about. What specifically is it about the initial statement that you find invalid? He wasn't making a judgement on female physicians. He was stating an observation (discrimination against female resident applicant exists) and followed it up with an opinion (the fact this type of discrimination exists is unfortunate). Presumably, he hopes the culture will change as it is apparent that he does not agree with discriminating against female applicants due to the possibility that they will contribute fewer years to the profession because babies. He was relating this to the possibility of discrimination against older applicants who also will probably contribute fewer years to the profession due to their personal circumstances, which he also would be against. It seems like you both are in general agreement. Lashing out at someone that agrees with you is counterproductive.
Maybe I'm missing something, and I could be totally wrong, but you haven't really articulated why you found his statement to be so offensive/disagreeable. Your reaction seems (to me) disproportionate to what he said.
I thought the same thingWhen did 30 become old????
I guess it is when you compare it to 22 and 23. Honestly, it's not young, but in the grand scheme of things: you.are.not.old.
Just wondering what the thoughts are on this?
When (hopefully) accepted, I will be 29 years of age starting school. I know there are always a couple of much older students in a class, but I'm wondering if medical schools will look on this unfavourably?
Will they think I'm too old to invest the time into training me, I won't graduate until 33-34, then depending on residency / specialty etc, I might not be an independent doctor until 40.
What do you guys think? Is there "ageism" in the admission process? Is it a big factor of consideration. Should I focus more on shorter residency? Would it be stupid to mention interest in surgery at my age, they might think I won't be an independent surgeon until 40.
Age discrimination is illegal.
Some of my all-time best students have been in their 30s and 40s; our oldest student ever matriculated was 53.
I wish that age was kept confidential in the medical profession, including on all applications, and on professional websites. It seems to be kept confidential in most other professions.... Maybe no one's raised the point yet to the right people.
Additionally, younger interviewers really need more training on how to interview older applicants. Age/experience can be an asset or a detriment in the interviewing process. Some of my most uncomfortable and lower quality interviews have been with 21 year old interviewers but my absolutely best interviews have been with older/seasoned interviewers. I do not mean this to be a knock on younger interviewers but I get the impression at some schools being an interviewer is no more than volunteering with no training or guidance if you have the free time, with no selection or training.Believe me, 21 year old interviewees can be a LOT different than 25 or 30 year old interviewees. I like knowing people ages so I can tailor questions to them.
OP:
In case you still need yet one more opinion, 30 is definitely not too old to get started. I am 40 and starting med school this year.
IMHO, successful applicants have to demonstrate both energy and maturity. The older you get, the more work you have to show you have the energy to make it.
30 is NOT too old, and I think there's a pretty good consensus on here about that. In fact, 35 still isn't too old.
Family life, kids, medical school, and timing: -- Many people have raised kids while going to medical school. It's not easy. I think most women hit menopause sometime in their early 40's.