Is Achiever Overly

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

klutzy1987

StudyingSucks Letsgo Mets
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Is the Achiever more difficult that the actual DAT. I was doing achiever and generally i get 15/15 (Kaplans, Topscore) in apeture passing and on Achiever i got only like 8/15. Also in the hole punching i saw that they had hole punches along a fold and folds halfway through holes. Does the Dat have punches like that or is that only Achiever.
 
achiever's pat is brutal, particularly tfe and apertures. on the otherside, topscores is ridiculously easy. the real thing is somewhere in between.
 
You can download it from website and use demo verison to see some example questions. If you like it, pay through online and they will give you activation key which you can use to unlock the program.
 
I am gettin between 13 and 11 on the angles on achiever compared to liike 6-8 on the crack PAT. Also the cube counting seems much more normal than the crack because there are no "illusions". The hole punching seems much more difficult than kaplans and topscore because of all of those partial folds and holes along folds. The apeture is completely rediculous on achiever in my opinion. I was getting perfect 15-15 on crack pat and achiever is like 8-9. Top front is equally dificult on all programs in my opinion. The paper folding seems even more difficult than crack pat also.
 
I would say that Achiever is a little more difficult except for the PAT. Achiever PAT is insane. It was nice though when I took the real DAT because the PAT seemed easy. I got 18's across the board on Achiever PAT and scored a 23 PAT on the real thing.