- Joined
- Jun 12, 2016
- Messages
- 1
- Reaction score
- 0
Hey y'all,
Loooong time lurker, first time poster here.
Something I've been wondering about admissions is whether adcoms view GPA as an incremental entity much as in Neuronix's sticky (3.8+ is excellent, 3.6+ is good) or whether we should really seek to maximize it (3.95>3.9>3.8). This would be very helpful for me (and I hope for others), because the prevailing advice for GPA here seems to be: MAXIMIZE, MAXIMIZE. But I wonder if I have an opportunity to take a random class on state of nature theory in political philosophy (incidentally which I took this past sem and it str8 up changed my life) that I know might drop my GPA, should take that chance so long as it can keep me in that "3.8+ excellent place?"
I couldn't find a post that talks about this (maybe I'm wrong?), so I would love to get peoples' thoughts, esp. the veterans (@Neuronix @QofQuimica @Fencer)?
Loooong time lurker, first time poster here.
Something I've been wondering about admissions is whether adcoms view GPA as an incremental entity much as in Neuronix's sticky (3.8+ is excellent, 3.6+ is good) or whether we should really seek to maximize it (3.95>3.9>3.8). This would be very helpful for me (and I hope for others), because the prevailing advice for GPA here seems to be: MAXIMIZE, MAXIMIZE. But I wonder if I have an opportunity to take a random class on state of nature theory in political philosophy (incidentally which I took this past sem and it str8 up changed my life) that I know might drop my GPA, should take that chance so long as it can keep me in that "3.8+ excellent place?"
I couldn't find a post that talks about this (maybe I'm wrong?), so I would love to get peoples' thoughts, esp. the veterans (@Neuronix @QofQuimica @Fencer)?