- Joined
- Jul 5, 2010
- Messages
- 304
- Reaction score
- 1
Primary care docs?
Yup, clinical experience is always good! 🙂
Yup, clinical experience is always good! 🙂
Shadowing =/= clinical experience.
OP, shadowing a PCP is a perfectly fine idea. Shadowing isn't absolutely necessary but if you want to do it, shadowing a few doctors for a few days each is all you need. Ideally and if possible, try to shadow a primary care doc, a surgeon, and some kind of specialist, just so you get to see a variety of things.
Shadowing is a clinical experience. What it is not is "volunteering". Schools that want to see service to the poor through clinical volunteering, non-clinical volunteering, or some combination of the two will not count shadowing as meeting the unwritten requirement for clinical volunteering.
Shadowing is a clinical experience. What it is not is "volunteering". Schools that want to see service to the poor through clinical volunteering, non-clinical volunteering, or some combination of the two will not count shadowing as meeting the unwritten requirement for clinical volunteering.
Oh my the world is going to expl...BTW, shadowing is not considered a clinical experience as it is a passive observership. Clinical experience implies actively engaging with sick people.
And the advantage of SDNers' exposure to multiple opinions on what constitutes a good application is that you can broaden the scope of your Experiences so that more schools (with varying missions) will give you consideration.This is exactly what you are up against.... one adcom member will interprete something one way and another will have a different standard. When you hear that this is a crap shoot, that's what they are talking about. Whether your application is assigned to me or to Cat' is just luck of the draw.
This is exactly what you are up against.... one adcom member will interprete something one way and another will have a different standard. When you hear that this is a crap shoot, that's what they are talking about. Whether your application is assigned to me or to Cat' is just luck of the draw.
Great explanations; we are all fortunate to have you both. 🙂And the advantage of SDNers' exposure to multiple opinions on what constitutes a good application is that you can broaden the scope of your Experiences so that more schools (with varying missions) will give you consideration.
This is exactly what you are up against.... one adcom member will interprete something one way and another will have a different standard. When you hear that this is a crap shoot, that's what they are talking about. Whether your application is assigned to me or to Cat' is just luck of the draw.
Who requires clinical volunteerism? I don't remember exactly but it might be in the Volunteer State. 😎
Would starting to do some "clinical volunteering" (according to the above definitions) right before submitting AMCAS help me at all?
Sorry for the derail...
Would starting to do some "clinical volunteering" (according to the above definitions) right before submitting AMCAS help me at all?
Sorry for the derail...
Oh my the world is going to expl...![]()
Not very much. The applicant I remember who corresponded with me through two cycles was told after a failed cycle that his state school liked to see a year of volunteering. IRC, he did that & got in the following year.
I have regular volunteering and really intense clinical experience (more than just shadowing) where I actually help out the docs plus a bunch of other medical stuff. Just don't have "clinical volunteering" with disadvantaged populations and the like.
Are you able to disclose which state school it was?