I don't think anyone here is arguing that they invited us only to intentionally reject us. Not even close. I also don't think we are arguing that we are the world's best interviewers, or that there isn't room for improvement. *Clearly* there is room for improvement. Isn't there always? I can undoubtedly think of multiple things I could have phrased better. I think most of us can when we reflect on our interviews.
We are merely suggesting that there are other factors beyond the interview that can influence accept/waitlist/reject decisions, and it isn't totally time to panic yet. Perhaps we only had average interviews and we did not move far enough up the
LizzyM stepladder. But I really find it hard to believe that my interviewer in particular would look me dead in the eye, tell me how nice it was to get to know me and that he thought my interview went stellar, only to turn around and tell the adcoms I was outrageously bad.
Sent from my iPhone using
SDN mobile