Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Two experiences prompted me to ask this question:
Based on these experiences, I have the following questions:
Thank you all for taking the time to read and respond to these questions.
- Recent Lawsuit: An oral and maxillofacial surgeon (OMS) I know was sued because a patient believed he was only a dentist, not qualified to perform a craniofacial surgery, despite the OMS having graduated from a six-year program and holding an MD.
- Insight from a Medical Professional: Someone in the medical field informed me that even though OMS graduates from a six-year program have an MD, they are often considered on the same level as a family physician in terms of medical training.
Based on these experiences, I have the following questions:
- Prevalence of Misconception: Are these just particular unfortunate experiences or personal opinions, or are they widely shared within the medical community? How severe is this discrimination?
- Is this a common view or just isolated incidents?
- Merit of Critique: Is this prejudice, or does it have some basis? Is the OMS route considered a "shortcut" in the medical field?
- I personally believe that 8-11 years of postgraduate training with dual doctoral degrees (DDS/DMD and MD) should be more than sufficient to train competent surgeons.
- Why do some people consider OMS less competent than other surgeons like ENT, neurosurgeons, or plastic surgeons who operate in similar areas?
- Are these other specialists actually receiving more robust training than OMS?
- Handling Discrimination: How have you dealt with this discrimination in your career? What advice would you give to current or future OMS practitioners?
Thank you all for taking the time to read and respond to these questions.