Is rad onc job market … rebounding?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
I totally agree...with some caveats. These may not even be applicable any more.

1. Elite academic places are effective at cultural messaging. You are made to feel like a bit of a loser if you don't continue in academics (although maybe a fair number of people have come to terms with the bargain of remaining in academics while functionally being a community doc in an extended network...I'm sure plenty of people believe these networks are our future).
2. If you went to Harvard (or similar) for med school (even more true for undergraduate), it rarely (not always) matters if you grew up in the Southern Tier of NY state or rural Missouri. You are not going back. Now if you went to a decent state school and worked your way to an elite training program...it's different. This is one of several areas where the absurd competitiveness of peak radonc has done damage. The geographic and undergraduate educational diversity of residents decreased at top places as "meritocracy" got out of hand.


I think the sum experience of life helps mold where you want to go. You grew up some where, went to the state school, trained in state...different than getting a whiff of Boston and high end academic culture and elite East Coast living,

(Regarding IMGs, location of training likely very important regarding distribution of long term employment).

I'm all for provincialism.
I don't think those are caveats haha - I think those are some of the core problems which I feel are unsolvable and, ultimately, why I feel maldistribution in medicine (RadOnc or otherwise) is unsolvable.

You're perfectly describing my own experience and why I know I'm "odd" (I know I'm odd for like, a TON of reasons, but...pertinent to this discussion).

1) I'm an MD-PhD with an "elite" pedigree. The cultural messaging was absolutely brutal, oppressive, crushing, basically - all the adjectives you can imagine. We all know this, of course.

To recognize that I had been lied to about academia being a truth-seeking meritocracy focused on improving human health, and was rather a bunch of egotistical middle schoolers thinking they were playing 4D chess by sending passive aggressive emails, and I would not be happy spending my life playing those games with these people...that was hard.

Deciding that I would be happier focusing on patient care - and then successfully executing a plan to have such a career - was harder.

2) I am fortunate enough to have quirky interests where I can live in fun cities and all their resources for many years, then return to an area where there isn't even a movie theater and still be fine with it.

At the end of the day, the extremely convoluted 15-year path that brought me back to an area with limited resources is not something I can replicate in a sort of "protocol to fix maldistribution".

Which is why I like virtual supervision, which I never expected to be "controversial" but clearly, as we see here on SDN, it deeply touches a nerve for people.

Yes, there are dangers. Of course it can be exploited. But it's also the only hope I see as we become an population with a predominantly elderly demographic to help provide medical care in places that will only struggle more and more as the years go on.

But...none of this is black and white. I wish I had better answers.
 
I don't think those are caveats haha - I think those are some of the core problems which I feel are unsolvable and, ultimately, why I feel maldistribution in medicine (RadOnc or otherwise) is unsolvable.

You're perfectly describing my own experience and why I know I'm "odd" (I know I'm odd for like, a TON of reasons, but...pertinent to this discussion).

1) I'm an MD-PhD with an "elite" pedigree. The cultural messaging was absolutely brutal, oppressive, crushing, basically - all the adjectives you can imagine. We all know this, of course.

To recognize that I had been lied to about academia being a truth-seeking meritocracy focused on improving human health, and was rather a bunch of egotistical middle schoolers thinking they were playing 4D chess by sending passive aggressive emails, and I would not be happy spending my life playing those games with these people...that was hard.

Deciding that I would be happier focusing on patient care - and then successfully executing a plan to have such a career - was harder.

2) I am fortunate enough to have quirky interests where I can live in fun cities and all their resources for many years, then return to an area where there isn't even a movie theater and still be fine with it.

At the end of the day, the extremely convoluted 15-year path that brought me back to an area with limited resources is not something I can replicate in a sort of "protocol to fix maldistribution".

Which is why I like virtual supervision, which I never expected to be "controversial" but clearly, as we see here on SDN, it deeply touches a nerve for people.

Yes, there are dangers. Of course it can be exploited. But it's also the only hope I see as we become an population with a predominantly elderly demographic to help provide medical care in places that will only struggle more and more as the years go on.

But...none of this is black and white. I wish I had better answers.
"Well intentioned" people have been trying to fix this maldistribution problem forever. Ronnie said it couldn't be done... unless you wanna turn commie.

 
If what you say is correct, why aren’t Nebraska and WV grads taking Kearney and rural WV jobs i see posted? reason is clear man. The jobs suck or they want to get to a bigger city or both.
The rural WV can’t fill because they’re probably offering $500k. If they offered $1.2m, i don’t think they’d have any issue filling up the spot whatsoever. For me and my classmates, money matters ALOT (thanks to Powell increasing interest rates astronomically) more than location. But if the rural WV is paying $500k and job in NYC is paying $380k, I have a hard time imagining anyone in my class would take the rural WV
 
The rural WV can’t fill because they’re probably offering $500k. If they offered $1.2m, i don’t think they’d have any issue filling up the spot whatsoever. For me and my classmates, money matters ALOT (thanks to Powell increasing interest rates astronomically) more than location. But if the rural WV is paying $500k and job in NYC is paying $380k, I have a hard time imagining anyone in my class would take the rural WV
One way to get around the problem of "they're probably offering $500K" is to start your own practice. I know, I know...
 
If only starting your own practice in rad onc was as easy as doing it in FM, Derm etc.
It’s even hard for those chaps these days. But yes, much easier than rad onc. If only ASTRO would do things to support the independent private rad onc practitioner (fight CONs, hype practical treatments like breast IMRT, support supervision autonomy, work with Medicare and insurances to codify expanded indications, help “intensity modulate” the workforce) it might help fix maldistribution!
 
It’s even hard for those chaps these days. But yes, much easier than rad onc. If only ASTRO would do things to support the independent private rad onc practitioner (fight CONs, hype practical treatments like breast IMRT, support supervision autonomy, work with Medicare and insurances to codify expanded indications, help “intensity modulate” the workforce) it might help fix maldistribution!
I've always wondered. What is the argument in favor of CONs? I can imagine reasons that a large health system would like to suppress competition, but what is the good or bad faith argument proponents would make in public for this requirement?
 
"Well intentioned" people have been trying to fix this maldistribution problem forever. Ronnie said it couldn't be done... unless you wanna turn commie.


Of course, Reagan of this era anti-Medicare and anti-Social Security. Might want to check out pre-war levels of poverty for our elderly. I doubt most of us would have jobs without Medicare availability.

Which is why I like virtual supervision, which I never expected to be "controversial" but clearly, as we see here on SDN, it deeply touches a nerve for people.
We are all seeing this through our own lens. That's the beauty of SDN...fairly atypical perspectives get represented.

If you are truly remote....like population density is pretty damn low...virtual is such a valuable tool. There are many patients for whom virtual services remarkably improves compliance. Many of our in person services are relatively low value.

But if one allows virtual as a replacement for in-person services, where population density and hospital density is relatively high (think entire coastal areas with a few exceptions), the change in markets will be remarkable and the capitalistic instincts of both large, nominally non-profit centers and entrepreneurial peers will undermine the value of many docs who have made careers at smaller community places over the years (me).

I believe in human contact. I believe that we should promote a society where people are encouraged to interact in person. Also, I do not have high confidence in most of our data tools for truly assigning quality (or even safety, where the important outcomes are rare events). The default conclusion will be "equivalence". It's a depressing equivalence.

You know what is almost universally low value IMO...home based care (sending teams of docs out to the home...or in the old days, home calls). You employ a ton of people to see very few patients. It takes time and travel. But, communities and local papers and individual families love it.

Other things that are low value? from a macro standpoint...cancer care in the elderly...prostate cancer screening...IGRT. Being a good doctor is low value...being an efficient one is high value.

So at present, I'm happy to support a regulatory environment that preserves in some way the value of an on-site radiation oncologist.
 
Of course, Reagan of this era anti-Medicare and anti-Social Security. Might want to check out pre-war levels of poverty for our elderly. I doubt most of us would have jobs without Medicare availability.


We are all seeing this through our own lens. That's the beauty of SDN...fairly atypical perspectives get represented.

If you are truly remote....like population density is pretty damn low...virtual is such a valuable tool. There are many patients for whom virtual services remarkably improves compliance. Many of our in person services are relatively low value.

But if one allows virtual as a replacement for in-person services, where population density and hospital density is relatively high (think entire coastal areas with a few exceptions), the change in markets will be remarkable and the capitalistic instincts of both large, nominally non-profit centers and entrepreneurial peers will undermine the value of many docs who have made careers at smaller community places over the years (me).

I believe in human contact. I believe that we should promote a society where people are encouraged to interact in person. Also, I do not have high confidence in most of our data tools for truly assigning quality (or even safety, where the important outcomes are rare events). The default conclusion will be "equivalence". It's a depressing equivalence.

You know what is almost universally low value IMO...home based care (sending teams of docs out to the home...or in the old days, home calls). You employ a ton of people to see very few patients. It takes time and travel. But, communities and local papers and individual families love it.

Other things that are low value? from a macro standpoint...cancer care in the elderly...prostate cancer screening...IGRT. Being a good doctor is low value...being an efficient one is high value.

So at present, I'm happy to support a regulatory environment that preserves in some way the value of an on-site radiation oncologist.
I think of it more as a therapeutic window.

The regulatory environment which would ease maldistribution would also enable some obvious exploits.

Sadly - the game is already fixed, and people only argue about it because the exploits are obvious, even to someone with zero business experience.

Meanwhile, the 21C/CyberKnife/Proton cabal have been owning RadOnc for 30 years...but in ways your average physician can't see.
 
Imagine you’re a small town school boy/girl. If you’re ambitious enough to go to a good school and medical school, you probably aren’t going to want to go back to that small town. Especially once you’ve had a taste of big city lifestyle. So it’s just not realistic for many smaller towns or cities to expect a “good fit” rad onc who grew up in Evansville, IN or Macon, GA.
 
What is the argument in favor of CONs?
IMO, an argument for CON is stabilization of regional healthcare environments.

Say you are in a county with utilization needs for 3 linacs, all associated with two community hospitals that are comprehensive in terms of providing health services to the community. There is CON present...basically meaning that the hospital based practices are doing the radonc.

When you look at the bottom line for those hospitals, oncology is a BFD. It really helps float lots of other service lines that are never going to be money makers under today's payment schedules. Those other service lines may in fact be more important for macro community health measures BTW.

Radonc in particular is a BFD with a high up front capital expenditure requirement. Enough volume and it's extremely high value. Not enough and there is substantial risk.

Also, the state floats the community hospitals to a significant degree with grants (also federal grants). Hospital viability is important to the state.

Lets get rid of CON and see what happens? Maybe nothing, but maybe encroachment by a third party with deep pockets, a substantial marketing budget and a willingness to partner with local "concierge" type practices. They may poach the higher payor mix portion of the population. They could have a dramatic impact on bottom line for the community hospitals. They could actually destabilize general health care services in the community.

Thus, CON...which applies to major health care expenditures in general. This is just radonc specific convo.
 
I like this brunch place in Indianapolis and the bike trails of Cleveland and the big park in St. Louis and the Chiefs in Kansas City and the bookstores in Ann Arbor. Yeah those cities and smaller towns are fine and people make it work. Do I prefer the tier 1 elite cities, though? Yeah I do.
 
I'm not sure that those jobs even mean anything?

Is the country filled with these jobs?
This is the trend for jobs that are posted in undesirable rural areas. I have investigated dozens of these jobs. It’s the same stupid model at every one of them. They don’t care about the quality of rad onc services and they’re not willing to pay for it. They will do whatever it takes to staff at bottom dollar just to be able to bill. They have no interest in determining what that costs them in terms of referrals, underutilization of tech, imaging, and ancillary services, etc.

If you want to practice in rural America and think it will give you a leg up in rad onc financially, nope… sorry.
 
I like this brunch place in Indianapolis and the bike trails of Cleveland and the big park in St. Louis and the Chiefs in Kansas City and the bookstores in Ann Arbor. Yeah those cities and smaller towns are fine and people make it work. Do I prefer the tier 1 elite cities, though? Yeah I do.
Not me. I can't wait to get out of NYC LA or Miami (concrete jungles) after a few days.

I think tier 2-3 is where it is at. A place with 1-3 major sports teams, good restaurant scene, arts/theater etc but can have/need a car and afford a decent house in the suburbs and an airport with a good variety of domestic/intl flights (or at least plenty of nonstops to the major hubs daily)
 
Last edited:
The rural WV can’t fill because they’re probably offering $500k. If they offered $1.2m, i don’t think they’d have any issue filling up the spot whatsoever. For me and my classmates, money matters ALOT (thanks to Powell increasing interest rates astronomically) more than location. But if the rural WV is paying $500k and job in NYC is paying $380k, I have a hard time imagining anyone in my class would take the rural WV
This is precisely my point. The economic realities of these places do not change because someone trained nearby or may have even “loved the area”. People will always decide what is best for them not because they trained nearby. Only way to fill these jobs is to offer higher pay or flood market with so many graduates, people essentially have no other choice.
 
Not me. I can't wait to get out of NYC LA or Miami after a few days, I think tier 2-3 is where it is at. A place with 1-3 major sports teams, good restaurant scene, but can/need a car and afford a decent house in the suburbs
I agree, but the spouse and family get inpt as well. I hear all the time now that radonc always had geographic restrictions and this is simply false. When I graduated there where jobs in every desirable city. A good program could land you a partinership track in northern Jersey or southern cal. Otherwise, you went academic or into an exploitative practice. The rbest path would have been to seek out a lucrative practice in a second tier location but I was overruled.
 
Last edited:
I agree, but the spouse and family get inpt as well. I hear all the time now that radonc always had geographic restrictions and this is simply false. When I graduated there where jobs in every desirable city. A good program could land you a partinership track in northern Jersey or southern cal. Otherwise, you went academic or into an exploitative practice. The rbest path would have been to seek out a lucrative practice in a second tier location but I was overruled.
Perhaps, but some smaller markets didn't have jobs every year. That's the still the case now. There is definitely more saturation to be sure now vs a decade or two ago. And definitely way less private/independent job availability
 
I thought I had seen the peakiest of peak rad onc but here we are… referring to cities in status tiers.
That's true for every specialty. The US has been losing rural population for years to the cities.

Have you talked to New grads or genXers in other specialties about geography? It's hugely important and the reason why gu and med onc can pay 2-4x what rad onc pays in some of these rural, hard to recruit areas.
 
The issue is you can make MGMA median (or near that) in an employed position in a decent city. I dont know about this tier status, but lets say a city with multiple professional sports teams.

So why would I leave my city to go 2-3 hr away to make a similar amount. Hard pass.

My city may not be first tier, but we got James Beard award winners and some damn good biryani. Can't get that in a true "rural area".
 
The issue is you can make MGMA median (or near that) in an employed position in a decent city. I dont know about this tier status, but lets say a city with multiple professional sports teams.

So why would I leave my city to go 2-3 hr away to make a similar amount. Hard pass.

My city may not be first tier, but we got James Beard award winners and some damn good biryani. Can't get that in a true "rural area".
We should rename ourselves Biryani Forum
 
I would add that the only way I'd go true rural would be to as a solo doc (or part of a 2-3 doc) practice where you bill pro fees.
I know of a few that are busy (think 30 on treat per doc), but make MGMA 90%th percentile. That would be worth it. I may do that at some point to get to financial independence earlier.
 
I would add that the only way I'd go true rural would be to as a solo doc (or part of a 2-3 doc) practice where you bill pro fees.
I know of a few that are busy (think 30 on treat per doc), but make MGMA 90%th percentile. That would be worth it. I may do that at some point to get to financial independence earlier.
No place will let you. They all want to employ and pay you per wRVU. A lot will even refuse to pay you 1099.

Which by my calculation around $70/wRVU comes out to collecting on your own. So if you can get that you save yourself the headache. The only downside is you lose the ability to be creative with your taxes.
 
That's true for every specialty. The US has been losing rural population for years to the cities.

Have you talked to New grads or genXers in other specialties about geography? It's hugely important and the reason why gu and med onc can pay 2-4x what rad onc pays in some of these rural, hard to recruit areas.
Yeah, it’s an issue in medicine in general. Noticeably more prevalent in competitive subspecialties, which I’m sure we all remember from med school there were those kids who basically made their specialty choice based on perceived status. LOL at the ones that chose rad onc for status back then.
 
Yeah, it’s an issue in medicine in general. Noticeably more prevalent in competitive subspecialties, which I’m sure we all remember from med school there were those kids who basically made their specialty choice based on perceived status. LOL at the ones that chose rad onc for status back then.
Some lucky folks who couldn't match into anything else got lucky in the 70s-90s too (like buying amzn after the dot com crash)
 
Some lucky folks who couldn't match into anything else got lucky in the 70s-90s too (like buying amzn after the dot com crash)
I know people with 9 figure net worth mostly from rad onc this applies too. The D students in med school. Meanwhile the 2010-2017 peak rad onc crew got nothing close to that . Funny how the universe works isn’t it?
 
No place will let you. They all want to employ and pay you per wRVU. A lot will even refuse to pay you 1099.

Which by my calculation around $70/wRVU comes out to collecting on your own. So if you can get that you save yourself the headache. The only downside is you lose the ability to be creative with your taxes.
I know of 1 place that does. Rad Onc has a pro fee agreement with hospital. Most others (med onc, surgeons) employed. I interviewed for the job. Short partner track (like 6 mo) and the salary was high as an associate (i.e. MGMA median). The area is actually nice for people that are okay with "rural life". It is not that rural really. Nice state university there, state parks etc. But 2 hr from a good airport. Probably 2 hr from good biryani.
It is objectively a good job. Busy, but not overwhelming for a single site. Problem is you can't convince people to live in this city.

The job has been posted for years and I know the rad onc has trouble recruiting due to locale.
 
I know of 1 place that does. Rad Onc has a pro fee agreement with hospital. Most others (med onc, surgeons) employed. I interviewed for the job. Short partner track (like 6 mo) and the salary was high as an associate (i.e. MGMA median). The area is actually nice for people that are okay with "rural life". It is not that rural really. Nice state university there, state parks etc. But 2 hr from a good airport. Probably 2 hr from good biryani.
It is objectively a good job. Busy, but not overwhelming for a single site. Problem is you can't convince people to live in this city.

The job has been posted for years and I know the rad onc has trouble recruiting due to locale.
I know of a similar one. Billing pro fees only. Split between the docs came out to about 400 each. PSA with hospital required 2 docs. Pass.
 
I totally agree...with some caveats. These may not even be applicable any more.

1. Elite academic places are effective at cultural messaging. You are made to feel like a bit of a loser if you don't continue in academics (although maybe a fair number of people have come to terms with the bargain of remaining in academics while functionally being a community doc in an extended network...I'm sure plenty of people believe these networks are our future).
2. If you went to Harvard (or similar) for med school (even more true for undergraduate), it rarely (not always) matters if you grew up in the Southern Tier of NY state or rural Missouri. You are not going back. Now if you went to a decent state school and worked your way to an elite training program...it's different. This is one of several areas where the absurd competitiveness of peak radonc has done damage. The geographic and undergraduate educational diversity of residents decreased at top places as "meritocracy" got out of hand.
MD Anderson has locations of 2017-2023 grads on their website. Looks about 50/50 academic vs pvt practice depending on how you count. I know of some residents prior to that who filled private jobs in maine, alaska, etc.

MSK has 2008-2023. More academic, around 73/11. That said not sure it has been updated as I know some people listed as academic are in pvt practice now. These kinds of big programs can and will fill jobs all over the country.

Agree with that best way to address overproduction of residents is to tighten ACGME standards as proposed by @thecarbonionangle. Would add to the list a 1:1 resident:faculty physics requirement.
 
I know this is true for some specialities but for Rad Onc do you have foreign trained Rad Onc getting jobs after doing a fellowship for a year or so?

Usually it is in an academic setting for a few years on a limited license and then can practice anywhere in US.
 
I know this is true for some specialities but for Rad Onc do you have foreign trained Rad Onc getting jobs after doing a fellowship for a year or so?

Usually it is in an academic setting for a few years on a limited license and then can practice anywhere in US.
I sure hope not. Job market is already mediocre. We should send some rad oncs to other countries instead of bringing in more
 
I know this is true for some specialities but for Rad Onc do you have foreign trained Rad Onc getting jobs after doing a fellowship for a year or so?

Usually it is in an academic setting for a few years on a limited license and then can practice anywhere in US.

I sure hope not. Job market is already mediocre. We should send some rad oncs to other countries instead of bringing in more
Yes this was common several decades ago in the US, also Canadians came down and took jobs, not just docs from overseas.

That loophole is mostly closed now iirc but heard at least one state may be reopening it:

 
I know this is true for some specialities but for Rad Onc do you have foreign trained Rad Onc getting jobs after doing a fellowship for a year or so?

Usually it is in an academic setting for a few years on a limited license and then can practice anywhere in US.
The alternative pathway still exists. There are multiple people per year and more than people think end up staying and taking a job in the US.
 
Unrelated, but has anyone noticed that there seems to be more and more rad oncs that leave practice (usually academics) for industry?
 
Unrelated, but has anyone noticed that there seems to be more and more rad oncs that leave practice (usually academics) for industry?

good. lot of non-onc physicians work related to cancer in industry, if they can, rad onc absolutely can and should.
 
Unrelated, but has anyone noticed that there seems to be more and more rad oncs that leave practice (usually academics) for industry?
Yup, I've noticed this in my network as well. I'm sure the WFH aspect doesn't hurt.
 
Unrelated, but has anyone noticed that there seems to be more and more rad oncs that leave practice (usually academics) for industry?
I guess that explains the little dead cat bounce in the job market. But with almost 200 new grads per year in the next few years, i’m not sure how long it’ll last. Such a shame that residency spots weren’t cut, we could’ve had a pretty hot job market!
 
Unrelated, but has anyone noticed that there seems to be more and more rad oncs that leave practice (usually academics) for industry?

This is a tiny sliver of the job market in general. I know a tiny handful.

I interned in industry years ago and knew five other rad oncs at the time.

I know a few more that jumped ship, but that's probably what, 10 rad oncs? I don't know everyone, so maybe 20 out of thousands of rad oncs?

I'm certainly open to being wrong. Are there new opportunities?
 
In my experience and based on contacts, most rad onc’s should be able to get a medical director job in clinical development at a biopharma company making 350k+ to start if they’re open to SF, Boston, SD, NY area
 
In my experience and based on contacts, most rad onc’s should be able to get a medical director job in clinical development at a biopharma company making 350k+ to start if they’re open to SF, Boston, SD, NY area

What do you do in these jobs? You are hired to do what exactly?
 
MD Anderson has locations of 2017-2023 grads on their website. Looks about 50/50 academic vs pvt practice depending on how you count. I know of some residents prior to that who filled private jobs in maine, alaska, etc.

MSK has 2008-2023. More academic, around 73/11. That said not sure it has been updated as I know some people listed as academic are in pvt practice now. These kinds of big programs can and will fill jobs all over the country.

Agree with that best way to address overproduction of residents is to tighten ACGME standards as proposed by @thecarbonionangle. Would add to the list a 1:1 resident:faculty physics requirement.

Crazy that someone from the MDACC class of 2018 took that Portsmouth Ohio position.
 
Crazy that someone from the MDACC class of 2018 took that Portsmouth Ohio position.
I don’t know about 6 years ago but right now they have a job post offering $668k base, $100k sign on bonus, upto 10% salary incentive bonus and $200k student loan assistant and 34days PTO! Location aside, probably one of the best positions financially. Also he went to University of Cincinnati for medical school so could be from that area
 
I don’t know about 6 years ago but right now they have a job post offering $668k base, $100k sign on bonus, upto 10% salary incentive bonus and $200k student loan assistant and 34days PTO! Location aside, probably one of the best positions financially. Also he went to University of Cincinnati for medical school so could be from that area
It's crazy. I'm not sure how Portsmouth compares to Chillicothe, OH but I remember that practice was offering a similar package (maybe even a higher base salary, I seem to remember 750k) like 13 years ago when I was last actively looking.

Probably the same for all of medicine, but our wages have completely stagnated.
 
It's crazy. I'm not sure how Portsmouth compares to Chillicothe, OH but I remember that practice was offering a similar package (maybe even a higher base salary, I seem to remember 750k) like 13 years ago when I was last actively looking.

Probably the same for all of medicine, but our wages have completely stagnated.
750k back then is 900 or so today which is what that job should be paying. Factor in PTO and Bennies and you can probably get close to it.
 
Top