Is the COVID19 NUMERATOR inaccurate?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

elburrito

Full Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2008
Messages
76
Reaction score
6
there is a lot of news about shortage of testing to confirm SARS-CoV2 infection status. Serum Antibody testing is often undersensitive but relatively more specific. But what if deaths are not even being properly recorded or reported? This would under-represent the numerator in the case fatality or infection mortality rates.

 
there is a lot of news about shortage of testing to confirm SARS-CoV2 infection status. Serum Antibody testing is often undersensitive but relatively more specific. But what if deaths are not even being properly recorded or reported? This would under-represent the numerator in the case fatality or infection mortality rates.


Yup, there is a lot of new population-wide data that have come out this past week showing that total deaths are significantly more than previous months and years, beyond what has been proven to be related to COVID-19, and it conceivable that the delta is also due to COVID-19 and underreporting.
 
I had hoped that the emerging data indicating high seroprevalence of IgG among asymptomatic patients might indicate that the true infection mortality rate is significantly lower than the case fatality rates of several percent (which were derived from RT-PCR on symptomatic patients only). However, Statistics 101, PPV correlates with prevalence. Is it possible that the seroprevalence based denominator increase may be contaminated by false positives?

1589567533359.png
 
Top