Please read you own arguement before implying that I took yours out of context.
From what I heard talking to my friends, the only clinical work they will let you do as an undergrad is total bull**** and is nothing like medicine at all.....
believe me the med schools know this, e.g. nurses and pharmacists have a lower acceptance rate to med school than do any other major.
By associating any clinical work you could do as an undergrad as 'bull****' and 'nothing like medicine' with nursing and pharmacists in the next phrase, you clearly state that such professions as nursing are in fact 'bull****' and 'nothing like medicine'. If this is not what you meant to imply, you need to totally rephrase your sentence and paragraph structure.
Doing research might actually make a difference in the world, yknow?
A direct quote from you, the use of verbal irony indicates a cynical and sarcastic view of anything contrary to research, i.e. clinical experience. Therefore, the phrasing used here says that clinical work has relatively little impact in the context, whatever context you were implying. (I'm not quite sure).
Florisio asked about its role in admissions, not its role in benefiting society.
Then address that. Once again, your poor paragraph structure makes it seem arbirtrary.
Obviously, people are needed in hospitals to do some of the **** work, and as undergrads possess no skills or medical education whatsoever (and are willing to work for free), they are ideal for this role.
This implies that anything outside of a doctor's work is ****work, and something that is far below you. While this may be your opinion, having worked in a clinical setting, these people (Even i was one for a while) are as invaluable as doctors.
. I never said anything that would lead one to believe that I undervalue nurses- where did you dream that up?
Perhaps one of your many condescending references to this subject. If you didn't mean to say that, please rephrase your paragraphs!
You obviously have skills above those that a normal undergrad possesses and thus your argument is somewhat irrelevant.
This is a very confusing statement. Re-read it please. Because he has skills above what a normal undergrad would have, his statement is irrelevant? Once again, poor wording is your choice of defense.
I never said that I think that all skilled medical professionals other than doctors do bull**** work.
No, you just implied that through poor wording and phrasing.
Sorry to sound mean, I'm not trying to be, I am simply pointing out flaws i see in your statements.
Thank You,
Intrepidation