- Joined
- Jun 17, 2009
- Messages
- 1,318
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 4,571
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
ooh those are good. the honey oat ones?Nature's Valley then, win.
yum.


ooh those are good. the honey oat ones?Nature's Valley then, win.
ooh those are good. the honey oat ones?
yum.
OH NOOO. You have to sacrifice a lot for her............ I would never give up the honey oat ones FOR ANYONE 😉 jk jk I know we've already gone over this. 😛Wife eats all of those, I'm always stuck with the Cinammon ones!
Obviously BLAMING society FOR the misconception. Attributing to society the fact that there is a misconception, not necessarily not blaming the models as well (Chicken or the egg?) I assert we should blame both. Thought the former would be inferred...
Yeesh, you should try law instead of pharmacy.
Sorry, I don't make an ass out of you and me whenever I can help it. 🙂 Clarified: if you didn't have "blame" in your sentence, you weren't blaming them, only pointing it out (noticing it) that it was a misconception on society's part.
I thought about law one day but I figured it'd be more fun to nit pick doctors and pharmacists on their penmanship and English.![]()
Hey at the end of the day, I'm just a dumb grunt.
One too many mTBI's, probably.
Although I really did think it was inferred from the sentence. Ah well, I suppose I can stand correct on this one.
To be fair, however, it isn't our society we'd be blaming. The "emaciated is hot" acculturation started at the end of the Victorian era. But, I guess that's off-topic and not really cogent to my ass being corrected.
OH NOOO. You have to sacrifice a lot for her............ I would never give up the honey oat ones FOR ANYONE 😉 jk jk I know we've already gone over this. 😛
Lol, I'm sure lawyers LOVE to pick on people who assume. Probably the easiest thing to point out and make the defendant look bad in the eyes of the jury.
I guess so but that doesn't mean society is excused from the blame if they actively participate in the act.
You're not wrong there. But that example is different from what you said.Alright, so this is the way I see it.
A guy is speeding on the freeway. This is an observation, indeed, however I am also blaming him for speeding. It's a tacit assumption, not just any old assumption. How am I wrong here? I am definitely not blaming the car for making the guy speed.
I know.And no one is excusing society, least of all, me.
True, it is redundent. It is more correct to just simply say "We have such a misconception in society about what makes a girl 'hot' these days. I also blame all of the 75 pound models." That is if you wanted to blame the 75 pound models in addition to society.So I should have said,
"We have such a misconception in society about what makes a girl "hot" these days. Blame all of the 75 pound models and society."?
TO me, again, that seems excruciatingly redundant, which I have noticed that you English mongers love to nitpick on (I am married to one).
It seems implied, thus needing to be inferred by the reader, that the antecedent clause, "We have such a misconception..." is placing blame on society for what we think is "hot", additionally blaming the models in the latter clause.
So glad I never, ever have to take another English class again.
I should have specified that I meant miami beach, where the only obese are the toruists, and sometimes the girls at Purdy Lounge for some reason. There was hardly a time I would go to the publix grocery on west ave and not see multiple women that would drop jaws anywhere else in the country. Try that at any other grocery store at any random time of day, not happening. The urban sprawl is another story, rice and beans will do that 🙂

Just outta curiousity.. why does it matter if she rehearsed it or not?
Its not like shes going to get a fine 😛
(Unless its a fine for being so fine..heh corny I know 🙄)
I think they wanted to see if that was her natural talent in interviewing/giving speech skills.i only mentioned it because someone else brought it up and i was trying to add to the conversation based on my having lived many places. it's really not relevant at all and if i was single i would hit it sober, no complaints, she's sorta cute, just depends what you get used to seeing every day 🙂
I think they wanted to see if that was her natural talent in interviewing/giving speech skills.
There was a commercial about something like that where cute girls don't think they're attractive because of all the supermodels today. I think it was a commercial for Dove.
Hail Grammar Nazi. 🤣
